Re: [hatari-devel] libreadline and libtermcap/curses (was: GCC 4.9 is now used on my builds) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] libreadline and libtermcap/curses (was: GCC 4.9 is now used on my builds)
- From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:22:42 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=TZJMwdcWgg/J0Lv1Pwj18bSXG0j8Q+m8ezTE9doKt7Y=; b=a56wX0Rqg1La+s/RK/fboWZ+LxybvIk21yrKiTc0c0KZ2VBs/q32nL5Z2rtG63jf8B HXsKBVvNXc28phB/L6UFruJiVHRGU/tlwRtlk0p7xUAln0e2JCRZ8/1vXvg0pVfZSNwp UO23kqGgoFMg0BRmjD6vNnS8iH/s4a/i4rNK9/Euy5zvFIPO99J1tNnID/Bc4gH2C2f9 Vg0yPZAWDCYMxx9M+EkLonJd31b+fzAJp+yLT2xZH8AjkUQeN8Js+iJKTGdP4GKYY+n6 1GWj/LX98fz/3/zabzukdqlouy6StqBV2EUUAg+ZMBoGSGkh8h0NqJ5vMpT1UR9OuMPk Vmkw==
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Sat, 31 May 2014 19:16:39 +0200
> schrieb Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > ncursesw ... never heard of that one before. Seems to be some kind
>> > of wide-character version of curses? I doubt that we need to link
>> > against that version since Hatari does not use wide characters.
>> > Don't you also have a normal ncurses on your system?
>> >
>>
>> That's the default one in Ubuntu. I know of other distros who just
>> have a symlink from ncurses to ncursesw.
>> But for my cross builds it will probably work just fine as I've
>> switched back to libtermcap.
>
> Ok, so I think I'll stay with the normal ncurses and termcap for now.
> By the way, I am also running Ubuntu here, and it seems like both
> libraries are installed by default here on my system.
>
> Anyway, I just discovered a stupid typo in my new CMake code ... could
> you please pull the latest version and try again?
>
Much better :-)
Still, trying to go all static seems to be a harder road than I was
hoping for, I think I'm switching back and try at a later time (when I
have time).
--
chs