Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]

Hi Tom,

I have queries regarding 2 issues I faced during compilation:

1. I had to remove a particular diff from the 3.2.50 patch file as it was already applied.
2. I had to include the following header in wok/linux/src/linux-3.2.50/drivers/net/ifb.c -
#include <linux/sched.h>

How to you go about handling these kind of issues in the SliTaz dev environment? If not handled these will come when someone compiles the packages for 3.2.50.


Regards,

Arun

http://regexp.co.nr


On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 9:42 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Arun,

so far it looks good, already running on my Portege - I will do an iso
and then we can check if we need any changes...

Thomas

On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 02:19:58 +0530
Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
> You can downalod the new set of packages from here:
> https://app.box.com/s/zkewp5z2x1idlorstpsr
>
> Please check the config and let me know if I need to change anything
> there.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Arun
>
> http://regexp.co.nr
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Arun Prakash Jana
> <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> > Possibly because I enabled PAE in the config options. As I mentioned
> > above, I am going through the config options again. Have patience..
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Arun
> >
> > http://regexp.co.nr
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:40 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Arun,
> >>
> >> you compiled a PAE Kernel - please dont do it - I will not be able
> >> to make a testing iso, becaus e my Portege R100 does not support
> >> PAE
> >>
> >> and also for testing the IDE devices its useless, because most of
> >> the IDE computeres dont support PAE
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >>
> >>  Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:39:38 +0530
> >> Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am revisiting the config options by comparing with those from
> >> > the Porteus config file... so please discard the above package.
> >> > I will upload the new set of packages in 1 or 2 days.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Arun
> >> >
> >> > http://regexp.co.nr
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Arun Prakash Jana
> >> > <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Tom,
> >> > >
> >> > > Copying my mail from the kernel discussion thread:
> >> > >
> >> > > Here goes the package for 3.2.50 I have compiled:
> >> > > https://app.box.com/s/jo2jeiqq86vypub3b8d7
> >> > >
> >> > > It has the modified config, log, packages and the modified
> >> > > patch in it. Check it out.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> >> > > Arun
> >> > >
> >> > > http://regexp.co.nr
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Arun Prakash Jana <
> >> > > engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hi Tom,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I too had to use a different system from last Friday to get it
> >> > >> done :). There had been many new config additions but the good
> >> > >> news is that the config changes are done now!
> >> > >> Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files.
> >> > >> Will work on that and upload everything once it's fixed.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Regards,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Arun
> >> > >>
> >> > >> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> Hi Arun,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the new
> >> > >>> IDE config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one week
> >> > >>> until it compiled fine.
> >> > >>> It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine and I
> >> > >>> just went there, when I had time....
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Thomas
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530
> >> > >>> Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> > I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE fix.
> >> > >>> > However it's taking a long time as there are many new
> >> > >>> > config changes. And in case of every missing config the
> >> > >>> > build is restarting rom the beginning. Is there any tweak
> >> > >>> > to continue from compile failure for the linux package
> >> > >>> > instead of building from the beginning or at least skip
> >> > >>> > the already built modules?
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Regards,
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Arun
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > > Hi Arun,
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > 3.2.50 is available
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > Thomas
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530
> >> > >>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > > Hi Tom,
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > OK, I got what you mean.
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Regards,
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Arun
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx>
> >> > >>> > > > wrote:
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Hi Arun,
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean
> >> > >>> > > > > you can try whatever you want, but I think, it will
> >> > >>> > > > > not go into SliTaz 5.0.
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from
> >> > >>> > > > > 2.6.36 to 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles -
> >> > >>> > > > > no more 486 support only 686 - there is a long
> >> > >>> > > > > thread about it.
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else...
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Thomas
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530
> >> > >>> > > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Hi Tom,
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > A new LTS is available:
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>>
> >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Can we try this one?
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Regards,
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Arun
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom
> >> > >>> > > > > > <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil,
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > As Kernel 3.2.. is a Longterm Kernel, in my
> >> > >>> > > > > > > oppinion for the stability of wok its better to
> >> > >>> > > > > > > stay with it - so we are at the moment on
> >> > >>> > > > > > > 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it
> >> > >>> > > > > > > with this one..
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>>
> >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > but I did not get all the other linux packages
> >> > >>> > > > > > > linke linux-wireless, linux-agp, linux-dialup
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would be
> >> > >>> > > > > > > cool to put them online, so I can do an iso and
> >> > >>> > > > > > > test with my ide devices...
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Thomas
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530
> >> > >>> > > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <jainkkapil@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > kernel if we are anyway doing a kernel update
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make it  a higher
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > version.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > hiccups with setup and last night I left the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > default things to build as they are. I can
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > see that the package linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > created. I will try with Tom's patch tonight
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > again.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > So I guess he will also update the same
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > results.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > around 3.11. Once the patch works fine for
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > 3.2..40, I am thinking of moving to the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > latest version with everything. What do you
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > guys say?
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Arun
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread....
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> blocker
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Thomas
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Hi,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > back regarding Slitaz 5.0:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > contribute to the release of version 5.0.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Can someone please list down the current
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > blockers for version 5.0 release?
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Regards,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Arun
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> --
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> >> > >>> > > > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> >> > >>> > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > --
> >> > >>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >>
> >>
> >


--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/



Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/