Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]
To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
From: tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:55:13 +0000
Hi Arun,

I am not really the person you can ask this question,
because I had already troubles to get wok working. This has to be
answered by somebody else. Hopfully I get a proper wok using your guide.

And I think, we have to look, if these errors also appear on a fresh wok

You asked somewhere, who is managing docs - we all are managing it -
just create an account and you can change the guides....


Thomas


 On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:43:02 +0530
Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> I have queries regarding 2 issues I faced during compilation:
> 
> 1. I had to remove a particular diff from the 3.2.50 patch file as it
> was already applied.
> 2. I had to include the following header in
> wok/linux/src/linux-3.2.50/drivers/net/ifb.c -
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> 
> How to you go about handling these kind of issues in the SliTaz dev
> environment? If not handled these will come when someone compiles the
> packages for 3.2.50.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Arun
> 
> http://regexp.co.nr
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 9:42 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Arun,
> >
> > so far it looks good, already running on my Portege - I will do an
> > iso and then we can check if we need any changes...
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 02:19:58 +0530
> > Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > You can downalod the new set of packages from here:
> > > https://app.box.com/s/zkewp5z2x1idlorstpsr
> > >
> > > Please check the config and let me know if I need to change
> > > anything there.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Arun
> > >
> > > http://regexp.co.nr
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Arun Prakash Jana
> > > <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> > >
> > > > Possibly because I enabled PAE in the config options. As I
> > > > mentioned above, I am going through the config options again.
> > > > Have patience.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Arun
> > > >
> > > > http://regexp.co.nr
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:40 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Arun,
> > > >>
> > > >> you compiled a PAE Kernel - please dont do it - I will not be
> > > >> able to make a testing iso, becaus e my Portege R100 does not
> > > >> support PAE
> > > >>
> > > >> and also for testing the IDE devices its useless, because most
> > > >> of the IDE computeres dont support PAE
> > > >>
> > > >> Thomas
> > > >>
> > > >>  Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:39:38 +0530
> > > >> Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I am revisiting the config options by comparing with those
> > > >> > from the Porteus config file... so please discard the above
> > > >> > package. I will upload the new set of packages in 1 or 2
> > > >> > days.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Regards,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Arun
> > > >> >
> > > >> > http://regexp.co.nr
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Arun Prakash Jana
> > > >> > <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi Tom,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Copying my mail from the kernel discussion thread:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Here goes the package for 3.2.50 I have compiled:
> > > >> > > https://app.box.com/s/jo2jeiqq86vypub3b8d7
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > It has the modified config, log, packages and the modified
> > > >> > > patch in it. Check it out.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Regards,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Arun
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > http://regexp.co.nr
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Arun Prakash Jana <
> > > >> > > engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> Hi Tom,
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> I too had to use a different system from last Friday to
> > > >> > >> get it done :). There had been many new config additions
> > > >> > >> but the good news is that the config changes are done now!
> > > >> > >> Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files.
> > > >> > >> Will work on that and upload everything once it's fixed.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Regards,
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Arun
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx>
> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>> Hi Arun,
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the
> > > >> > >>> new IDE config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one
> > > >> > >>> week until it compiled fine.
> > > >> > >>> It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine
> > > >> > >>> and I just went there, when I had time....
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> Thomas
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530
> > > >> > >>> Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> > I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE
> > > >> > >>> > fix. However it's taking a long time as there are many
> > > >> > >>> > new config changes. And in case of every missing
> > > >> > >>> > config the build is restarting rom the beginning. Is
> > > >> > >>> > there any tweak to continue from compile failure for
> > > >> > >>> > the linux package instead of building from the
> > > >> > >>> > beginning or at least skip the already built modules?
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > Regards,
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > Arun
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx>
> > > >> > >>> > wrote:
> > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > >>> > > Hi Arun,
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > > 3.2.50 is available
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > > Thomas
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530
> > > >> > >>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >> > >>> > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > OK, I got what you mean.
> > > >> > >>> > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > Regards,
> > > >> > >>> > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > Arun
> > > >> > >>> > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > >> > >>> > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom
> > > >> > >>> > > > <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> > >>> > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > Hi Arun,
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I
> > > >> > >>> > > > > mean you can try whatever you want, but I think,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > it will not go into SliTaz 5.0.
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change
> > > >> > >>> > > > > from 2.6.36 to 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of
> > > >> > >>> > > > > troubles - no more 486 support only 686 - there
> > > >> > >>> > > > > is a long thread about it.
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else...
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > Thomas
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530
> > > >> > >>> > > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana
> > > >> > >>> > > > > <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > A new LTS is available:
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >>
> > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > Can we try this one?
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > Regards,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > Arun
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > oppinion for the stability of wok its better
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > to stay with it - so we are at the moment on
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > with this one.
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >>
> > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > well, but I did not get all the other linux
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > packages linke linux-wireless, linux-agp,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > linux-dialup
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > be cool to put them online, so I can do an
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > iso and test with my ide devices...
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Thomas
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <jainkkapil@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun.
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > kernel if we are anyway doing a kernel
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > update from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make it  a
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > higher version.
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > hiccups with setup and last night I left
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > the default things to build as they are.
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > I can see that the package
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I created. I will
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > try with Tom's patch tonight again.
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > night. So I guess he will also update
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > the same results.
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > is around 3.11. Once the patch works
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > fine for 3.2.40, I am thinking of moving
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > to the latest version with everything.
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > What do you guys say?
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Arun
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > > <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread....
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> main blocker
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Thomas
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > back regarding Slitaz 5.0:
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > >>> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > like to contribute to the release of
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > version 5.0. Can someone please list
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > down the current blockers for version
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > 5.0 release?
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Regards,
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Arun
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > --
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > > --
> > > >> > >>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> > > >> > >>> > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > > --
> > > >> > >>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> > > >> > >>> > > http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>> > >
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>> --
> > > >> > >>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >
> >


-- 
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
References:
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: SliTaz testing iso with new kernel 3.2.50
Next by Date: Re: SliTaz testing iso with new kernel 3.2.50
Previous by thread: Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
Next by thread: Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+
http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/