Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


Hi Tom,

I too had to use a different system from last Friday to get it done :).
There had been many new config additions but the good news is that the config changes are done now!
Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files. Will work on that and upload everything once it's fixed.



Regards,

Arun

http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Arun,

I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the new IDE
config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one week until it compiled
fine.
It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine and I just went
there, when I had time....

Thomas

On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530
Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE fix. However it's
> taking a long time as there are many new config changes. And in case
> of every missing config the build is restarting rom the beginning. Is
> there any tweak to continue from compile failure for the linux
> package instead of building from the beginning or at least skip the
> already built modules?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Arun
>
> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Arun,
> >
> > 3.2.50 is available
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530
> > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > OK, I got what you mean.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Arun
> > >
> > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Arun,
> > > >
> > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean you can try
> > > > whatever you want, but I think, it will not go into SliTaz 5.0.
> > > >
> > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from 2..6.36 to
> > > > 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles - no more 486 support
> > > > only 686 - there is a long thread about it.
> > > >
> > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else...
> > > >
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530
> > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > >
> > > > > A new LTS is available:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml
> > > > >
> > > > > Can we try this one?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Arun
> > > > >
> > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my oppinion for the
> > > > > > stability of wok its better to stay with it - so we are at
> > > > > > the moment on 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it
> > > > > > with this one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well, but I did
> > > > > > not get all the other linux packages linke linux-wireless,
> > > > > > linux-agp, linux-dialup
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would be cool to put
> > > > > > them online, so I can do an iso and test with my ide
> > > > > > devices...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thomas
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530
> > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <jainkkapil@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of kernel if we are
> > > > > > > anyway doing a kernel update from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make
> > > > > > > it  a higher version.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash Jana
> > > > > > > <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial hiccups with
> > > > > > > > setup and last night I left the default things to build
> > > > > > > > as they are. I can see that the package
> > > > > > > > linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I created. I will try with Tom's
> > > > > > > > patch tonight again.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night. So I guess he
> > > > > > > > will also update the same results.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is around 3.11.
> > > > > > > > Once the patch works fine for 3.2.40, I am thinking of
> > > > > > > > moving to the latest version with everything. What do
> > > > > > > > you guys say?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Arun
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Arun,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread....
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main blocker
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thomas
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530
> > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month back regarding
> > > > > > > >> > Slitaz 5.0:
> > > > > > > >> > http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to
> > > > > > > >> > contribute to the release of version 5.0.
> > > > > > > >> > Can someone please list down the current blockers for
> > > > > > > >> > version 5.0 release?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Regards,
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Arun
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >
> >


--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/