Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:40 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Arun,

you compiled a PAE Kernel - please dont do it - I will not be able to
make a testing iso, becaus e my Portege R100 does not support PAE

and also for testing the IDE devices its useless, because most of the
IDE computeres dont support PAE

Thomas

Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:39:38 +0530

Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am revisiting the config options by comparing with those from the
> Porteus config file... so please discard the above package. I will
> upload the new set of packages in 1 or 2 days.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Arun
>
> http://regexp.co.nr
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Arun Prakash Jana
> <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Copying my mail from the kernel discussion thread:
> >
> > Here goes the package for 3.2.50 I have compiled:
> > https://app.box.com/s/jo2jeiqq86vypub3b8d7
> >
> > It has the modified config, log, packages and the modified patch in
> > it. Check it out.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Arun
> >
> > http://regexp.co.nr
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Arun Prakash Jana <
> > engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> I too had to use a different system from last Friday to get it
> >> done :). There had been many new config additions but the good
> >> news is that the config changes are done now!
> >> Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files. Will
> >> work on that and upload everything once it's fixed.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Arun
> >>
> >> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Arun,
> >>>
> >>> I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the new IDE
> >>> config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one week until it
> >>> compiled fine.
> >>> It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine and I
> >>> just went there, when I had time....
> >>>
> >>> Thomas
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530
> >>> Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE fix.
> >>> > However it's taking a long time as there are many new config
> >>> > changes. And in case of every missing config the build is
> >>> > restarting rom the beginning. Is there any tweak to continue
> >>> > from compile failure for the linux package instead of building
> >>> > from the beginning or at least skip the already built modules?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> >
> >>> > Arun
> >>> >
> >>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi Arun,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 3.2.50 is available
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thomas
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530
> >>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi Tom,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > OK, I got what you mean.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Regards,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Arun
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > Hi Arun,
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean you
> >>> > > > > can try whatever you want, but I think, it will not go
> >>> > > > > into SliTaz 5.0.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from
> >>> > > > > 2.6.36 to 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles - no
> >>> > > > > more 486 support only 686 - there is a long thread about
> >>> > > > > it.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else...
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Thomas
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530
> >>> > > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Hi Tom,
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > A new LTS is available:
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Can we try this one?
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Regards,
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > Arun
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx>
> >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil,
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my oppinion
> >>> > > > > > > for the stability of wok its better to stay with it -
> >>> > > > > > > so we are at the moment on 3.2.48, so when you try a
> >>> > > > > > > new kernel, try it with this one.
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well, but I
> >>> > > > > > > did not get all the other linux packages linke
> >>> > > > > > > linux-wireless, linux-agp, linux-dialup
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would be cool
> >>> > > > > > > to put them online, so I can do an iso and test with
> >>> > > > > > > my ide devices...
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > Thomas
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530
> >>> > > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <jainkkapil@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun.
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of kernel if
> >>> > > > > > > > we are anyway doing a kernel update from 2.6 to
> >>> > > > > > > > 3.2, why not make it a higher version.
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash Jana
> >>> > > > > > > > <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial hiccups
> >>> > > > > > > > > with setup and last night I left the default
> >>> > > > > > > > > things to build as they are. I can see that the
> >>> > > > > > > > > package linux-3.2..40.tazpkg I created. I will try
> >>> > > > > > > > > with Tom's patch tonight again.
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night. So I
> >>> > > > > > > > > guess he will also update the same results.
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is around
> >>> > > > > > > > > 3.11. Once the patch works fine for 3.2.40, I am
> >>> > > > > > > > > thinking of moving to the latest version with
> >>> > > > > > > > > everything. What do you guys say?
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > Arun
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom
> >>> > > > > > > > > <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun,
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread....
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main
> >>> > > > > > > > >> blocker
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >> Thomas
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530
> >>> > > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana
> >>> > > > > > > > >> <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > Hi,
> >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month back
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > regarding Slitaz 5.0:
> >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >>> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50
> >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > contribute to the release of version 5.0.
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > Can someone please list down the current
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > blockers for version 5.0 release?
> >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > Regards,
> >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > Arun
> >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >> --
> >>> > > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> >>> > > > > > > > >> http://www.slitaz.org/
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >>> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > --
> >>> > > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz..org/
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > --
> >>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >

--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/