Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]
Hi Arun,
I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean you can try whatever
you want, but I think, it will not go into SliTaz 5.0.
Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from 2.6.36 to
2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles - no more 486 support only 686 -
there is a long thread about it.
But this has to be answered by somebody else...
Thomas
Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530
schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Tom,
>
> A new LTS is available:
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml
>
> Can we try this one?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Arun
>
> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Arun and Kapil,
> >
> > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my oppinion for the
> > stability of wok its better to stay with it - so we are at the
> > moment on 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it with this
> > one.
> >
> >
> > http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml
> >
> > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well, but I did not get
> > all the other linux packages linke linux-wireless, linux-agp,
> > linux-dialup
> >
> > if you they compile on your system, it would be cool to put them
> > online, so I can do an iso and test with my ide devices...
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530
> > schrieb kapil jain <jainkkapil@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > I have had the similar results as Arun.
> > >
> > > I second the thought of newer version of kernel if we are anyway
> > > doing a kernel update from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make it a higher
> > > version.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash Jana
> > > <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >
> > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial hiccups with setup and
> > > > last night I left the default things to build as they are. I can
> > > > see that the package linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I created. I will try
> > > > with Tom's patch tonight again.
> > > >
> > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night. So I guess he will
> > > > also update the same results.
> > > >
> > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is around 3.11. Once the
> > > > patch works fine for 3.2.40, I am thinking of moving to the
> > > > latest version with everything. What do you guys say?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Arun
> > > >
> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Arun,
> > > >>
> > > >> can you please see the kernel thread....
> > > >>
> > > >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion
> > > >>
> > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main blocker
> > > >>
> > > >> Thomas
> > > >>
> > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530
> > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I started the following thread a month back regarding Slitaz
> > > >> > 5.0: http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to contribute to the
> > > >> > release of version 5.0.
> > > >> > Can someone please list down the current blockers for
> > > >> > version 5.0 release?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Regards,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Arun
> > > >> >
> > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >
> >
--
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |