Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]

To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
From: tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 16:12:33 +0000

Hi Arun,

so far it looks good, already running on my Portege - I will do an iso
and then we can check if we need any changes...

Thomas

On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 02:19:58 +0530
Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> You can downalod the new set of packages from here:
> https://app.box.com/s/zkewp5z2x1idlorstpsr
> 
> Please check the config and let me know if I need to change anything
> there.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Arun
> 
> http://regexp.co.nr
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Arun Prakash Jana
> <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> 
> > Possibly because I enabled PAE in the config options. As I mentioned
> > above, I am going through the config options again. Have patience.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Arun
> >
> > http://regexp.co.nr
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:40 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Arun,
> >>
> >> you compiled a PAE Kernel - please dont do it - I will not be able
> >> to make a testing iso, becaus e my Portege R100 does not support
> >> PAE
> >>
> >> and also for testing the IDE devices its useless, because most of
> >> the IDE computeres dont support PAE
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >>
> >>  Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:39:38 +0530
> >> Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am revisiting the config options by comparing with those from
> >> > the Porteus config file... so please discard the above package.
> >> > I will upload the new set of packages in 1 or 2 days.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Arun
> >> >
> >> > http://regexp.co.nr
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Arun Prakash Jana
> >> > <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Tom,
> >> > >
> >> > > Copying my mail from the kernel discussion thread:
> >> > >
> >> > > Here goes the package for 3.2.50 I have compiled:
> >> > > https://app.box.com/s/jo2jeiqq86vypub3b8d7
> >> > >
> >> > > It has the modified config, log, packages and the modified
> >> > > patch in it. Check it out.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> >> > > Arun
> >> > >
> >> > > http://regexp.co.nr
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Arun Prakash Jana <
> >> > > engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Hi Tom,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I too had to use a different system from last Friday to get it
> >> > >> done :). There had been many new config additions but the good
> >> > >> news is that the config changes are done now!
> >> > >> Post compilation I am hitting an issue with receipt files.
> >> > >> Will work on that and upload everything once it's fixed.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Regards,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Arun
> >> > >>
> >> > >> http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:57 AM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> Hi Arun,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I dont know one - but it was for me the same to get the new
> >> > >>> IDE config for 3.2.40 - it took something like one week
> >> > >>> until it compiled fine.
> >> > >>> It was running it on my sound and video cutting machine and I
> >> > >>> just went there, when I had time....
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Thomas
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 08:44:00 +0530
> >> > >>> Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> > I am using 3.2.50 along with the config file for IDE fix.
> >> > >>> > However it's taking a long time as there are many new
> >> > >>> > config changes. And in case of every missing config the
> >> > >>> > build is restarting rom the beginning. Is there any tweak
> >> > >>> > to continue from compile failure for the linux package
> >> > >>> > instead of building from the beginning or at least skip
> >> > >>> > the already built modules?
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Regards,
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > Arun
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:36 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>> > > Hi Arun,
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > 3.2.50 is available
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > Thomas
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > Am Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:44:05 +0530
> >> > >>> > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > > Hi Tom,
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > OK, I got what you mean.
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Regards,
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > Arun
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, tom <kult-ex@xxxxxx>
> >> > >>> > > > wrote:
> >> > >>> > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Hi Arun,
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > I know, that there is a LTS 3.4.xx Kernel - I mean
> >> > >>> > > > > you can try whatever you want, but I think, it will
> >> > >>> > > > > not go into SliTaz 5.0.
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Just an experience from 3.0 - there was a change from
> >> > >>> > > > > 2.6.36 to 2.6.37 ?? and it made a lot of troubles -
> >> > >>> > > > > no more 486 support only 686 - there is a long
> >> > >>> > > > > thread about it.
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > But this has to be answered by somebody else...
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Thomas
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > Am Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:33:09 +0530
> >> > >>> > > > > schrieb Arun Prakash Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Hi Tom,
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > A new LTS is available:
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>>
> >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-4-54-LTS-Officially-Released-370824.shtml
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Can we try this one?
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Regards,
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > Arun
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:58 PM, tom
> >> > >>> > > > > > <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>> > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Hi Arun and Kapil,
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > As Kernel 3.2. is a Longterm Kernel, in my
> >> > >>> > > > > > > oppinion for the stability of wok its better to
> >> > >>> > > > > > > stay with it - so we are at the moment on
> >> > >>> > > > > > > 3.2.48, so when you try a new kernel, try it
> >> > >>> > > > > > > with this one.
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>>
> >> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-3-2-48-LTS-Officially-Released-with-UEFI-Anti-bricking-Code-364558.shtml
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > When I compiled in spring, linux compiled well,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > but I did not get all the other linux packages
> >> > >>> > > > > > > linke linux-wireless, linux-agp, linux-dialup
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > if you they compile on your system, it would be
> >> > >>> > > > > > > cool to put them online, so I can do an iso and
> >> > >>> > > > > > > test with my ide devices...
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Thomas
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > Am Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:27:42 +0530
> >> > >>> > > > > > > schrieb kapil jain <jainkkapil@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > I have had the similar results as Arun.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > I second the thought of newer version of
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > kernel if we are anyway doing a kernel update
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > from 2.6 to 3.2, why not make it  a higher
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > version.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Arun Prakash
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > Jana <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Here's an update - I am past the initial
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > hiccups with setup and last night I left the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > default things to build as they are. I can
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > see that the package linux-3.2.40.tazpkg I
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > created. I will try with Tom's patch tonight
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > again.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Kapil was also trying the same last night.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > So I guess he will also update the same
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > results.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > A thought here - as the mainline kernel is
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > around 3.11. Once the patch works fine for
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > 3.2.40, I am thinking of moving to the
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > latest version with everything. What do you
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > guys say?
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > Arun
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, tom
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > > <kult-ex@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Hi Arun,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> can you please see the kernel thread....
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/kernel-config-discussion
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> for older PCs with IDE drives it is the main
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> blocker
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Thomas
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:53:20 +0530
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> schrieb Arun Prakash Jana
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> <engineerarun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Hi,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I started the following thread a month
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > back regarding Slitaz 5.0:
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> http://forum.slitaz.org/topic/release-date-for-slitaz-50
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > I have got some time now and would like to
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > contribute to the release of version 5.0.
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Can someone please list down the current
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > blockers for version 5.0 release?
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Regards,
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > Arun
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> > http://oldpapyrus.wordpress.com/
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> --
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >> http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >>
> >> > >>> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> >> > >>> > > > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > > --
> >> > >>> > > > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list -
> >> > >>> > > > > http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > > > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > > --
> >> > >>> > > SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>> > >
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
> >>
> >>
> >


-- 
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana

References:
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: tom
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana
- Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
  - From: Arun Prakash Jana

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
Next by Date: Slitaz: Please include link to LinuxCommand.org in Documentation folder
Previous by thread: Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers
Next by thread: Re: Slitaz version 5.0 blockers

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/