Re: Wok and packages status

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]

To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Wok and packages status
From: Rohit Joshi <rj.rohit@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:18:01 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fzViF77QGwGOnKegrInfu505cDdmPfzntpdasRlbstA=; b=G3V+a/Bpwhr1xwaVrc/rKFYw/SA7lZ6Mv6JUEHE2M05F9ETNC0JGZi11kCiJxM4wGQ KM0artEYhmBKmWW+th/i9+HPZWM84NS+UDKWvP6L7jy06EIX+jvyWGhrqkvXXe8mPrYP MsYtPxqBsAIaafV3uRuCpST/Kp5dYi2SZKJ/k=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BDEaP7NEF4r6qvlx1598aTDzoUSgxGRQF22REMaR7F3aB/lJPAx2DyUF6Rnv/EeKfU f/J+axX0bUBYqsR2cIZM3cJHhXo1OLt2DC0FrkQ0HqT5h36eYNtUOhUzmPCxjKQ8ahvp 8uku1B1UL9i+EduTPZQZcAr+vc64kT5/va/+I=

In fact the wok experimental has already been moved to wok when godane
and me thought that previous cooking build environnment wad dead; it's
why some people was quite disapointed few days ago.

Then, probably you should remove wok-experimental.. Slitaz naming conventions is more "cuisine"-based, so wok-undigest is more appropriate. Its just confusing everyone.

Rohit

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wok and packages status
  - From: Indigo

References:
- Wok and packages status
  - From: Christophe Lincoln
- Re: Wok and packages status
  - From: GoKhlaYeh
- Re: Wok and packages status
  - From: pascal . bellard
- Re: Wok and packages status
  - From: Rohit Joshi
- Re: Wok and packages status
  - From: GoKhlaYeh

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: Wok and packages status
Next by Date: Re: Wok and packages status
Previous by thread: Re: Wok and packages status
Next by thread: Re: Wok and packages status

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/