| Re: [hatari-users] hatariui |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-users Archives
]
Hi,
On 11/18/2017 12:10 AM, Vincent Rivière wrote:
On 17/11/2017 at 21:35, Eero Tamminen wrote:
I.e. both SDL used by Hatari, and Gtk used by Hatari UI
need to be using X / XWayland, or things will fail:
xwininfo: Window id: 0x2800003 "Hatari UI v1.3"
xwininfo: Window id: 0x2a00013 "Hatari v2.0.0"
So I assume both windows use X.
On the other hand, xwininfo fails to give information for gedit, so I
assume that one is pure Wayland.
If you run the following command to get hex ID of X window to which
Hatari was requested to be re-parented:
tr '\0' '\n' < /proc/$(pidof hatari)/environ |\
grep PARENT_WIN_ID |\
awk -F= '{printf("%s = 0x%x\n", $1, $2)}'
Does that match any of the Hatari UI windows:
xwininfo -name "Hatari UI v1.3" -tree
?
In normal X, it does, and one sees the window in Hatari UI window tree:
-------------------------
PARENT_WIN_ID = 0x3a0002a
$ xwininfo -name "Hatari UI v1.3" -tree
xwininfo: Window id: 0x3a00003 "Hatari UI v1.3"
Root window id: 0x88 (the root window) (has no name)
Parent window id: 0x2606028 (has no name)
2 children:
0x3a0002a (has no name): () 640x436+0+25 +19+103
1 child:
0x3c0000d "Hatari v2.0.0": ("hatari" "hatari") 640x436+0+0
+19+103
0x3a00004 (has no name): () 1x1+-1+-1 +18+77
-------------------------
Also, remember that I have now an hybrid installation, with hatari
binaries coming from Ubuntu packages, and Hatari UI parts coming from HG.
That shouldn't affect anything.
Anyway, that reparenting question is a minor issue. But be warned it can
actually be a problem for newer systems.
Thanks again for testing!
- Eero