Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives ]

To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
From: Cyprian Konador <cyprian.konador@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:22:09 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rV06anljbOvhQoDZGX6QL7bGn+JPecpE5MpBwVvK73E=; b=U5/JHqARlR+auPwGellOhY9kb7/uEbkYptMndxWR8nKMYnZp7T2tF5dxogHSGjRTo2 qyvpH8v9hn0zz0t6N4AchkFzkagi+KbbJ/ym5LC/vpD7UT0v5CUvM1O3GXmdQ45LVqSG trDQUnzSuPaZu7e8cM4hAZJHbqBogS+O9jsWPuzWOAIImRzsp/yL4vSAh8l7pWZjeXbX rF6v9dNdrhUFkkyFlsOoGED7MAWNLTMGVU0JaM9MVAGOf8eSZxfaSy4HFqcJjn3pmfX+ b53K06QQekg6utIMKyH5d7CT1ZiDOxbwzbEV4V1/uQjydCli0t8hYu/UahLMIoy9kXlu n50A==

On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 at 23:56, Eero Tamminen wrote:

I know 030 has only 256 byte icache, and I haven't heard 68000 having
cache except it being mentioned few times in relation to MegaSTE with no
details (I though 68000 had just things like instruction pairing).

there you can find some details about Mega STE cache:

https://dhs.nu/bbs-coding/index.php?request=3402

Regards

Cyprian

References:
- [hatari-devel] cfg
  - From: Miguel Saro
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Eero Tamminen
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Thomas Huth
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Miguel Saro
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Miguel Saro
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Thomas Huth
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Christian Zietz
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Thomas Huth
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Nicolas Pomarède
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Christian Zietz
- Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
  - From: Eero Tamminen

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
Next by Date: [hatari-devel] Disassembler crashes if not in supervisor mode
Previous by thread: Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
Next by thread: [hatari-devel] Emulation on separate CPU cores

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/