Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
- From: Christian Zietz <czietz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 09:36:19 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1670661380; bh=aEQ1YMtmx7ptTJeco5ZtW89MBu9TvkR+ZTRSlPIDOBs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=tPskiGtzosBdM0hkIbNQaiAcaUONKeKPb8AKEG6ep56eP8GZpv55kXhvX4O6nzfkT XL5SkDOGoXgLbCBcyqyZy5qJl5baF3NKQhYSoOSfCuM0LWmmNEdzd8qyLVxmkeIawW rYdbjIcql8LRvpzZSH0w/vo9FP6xXD1mBa0cCynkT+WPhgsE+I1diowG4BpJFpL4FA F43HbkF+MocWxHUdA92CuHhFQsLtBi4FNxCwIWgMnGhmGT7DW5KgHEwDaIpAJW0TyU M/KOwwwG7ool+NDpF2JETLyJi8bW/W5aZ9x2DL/fn0Kx7P3aOejIawN1Qz2MEAaZiQ A8cR1/4xFLHBw==
- Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:BxDMLBz0K1Q=;uoQeWGZFWcyaLMKkd/cR14p+JGR C1i7vUrMbgYihKhbvaq5W/TajuONGXAWAtS7LTv7YuGvFu5Cb0Yg/wZ2dDUfcxRXXbJAMW0Ps TUVQUai7zUpiqhrH3UwTcOVc2+P0y71aroTl4hYsK80d7ZjM9mpsNvhoY3gAYNDBBivC0HHcL CxpgsXIUoaiJnfHx5N+RkILigHnzxv1N9JLgGykt2QMC77jFgUmPZT/BgXjtpNLqvcfdQ8uUP QEKku146sIySPYsvpybs4mak6w/H4Vxh+/4ZT0Q1U/fNe4Xo85P68m/epDjMT3w7NSkt6wZ5b YIjlonwztILkyUfI5Z8GCSOxtd7VBnNEIx2o16R+8qyWyKAI2la3eBj5hGt3+XoubWmIqBHkL 1vjYxxQ85Bw4AVwxdT9qpH4/5Ph77vSydG33CXT1VNyO005HJ5epdqULrdYkek/CbA53s/2se u0eDZhyre4l+fpVNsIIPC242I044O/T8QjBirzcQgOmsWdzidgcYrF6lQ4xGMOGuvSPhThrKp 0yT0yp5khlDTtA4y0C3C2rOSFK/nF7AeiyJ5deMoRob6iLPeN9MkGlG5ZaLDuekbPpq2klAre nQomkh6dbkworRzY1wtwcqGw7fLP+m3cQLrOxQBP7q/LIHTUsg+rvEG9IilO4gc9oawTW1qvH 3Ddb9zHBWXwP/alZKoakHJ/EunaiVube74GyfLycQYictko2bI7Dgv86fyX2Tx7r73D32DjRe BIxJyGViHQcIdZAybrMfgOeQ0qaSi9M++qjp2l24hDQ9N/awmDnyeFrmmYX6EBol/SWU+hxF0 p8uG5a6h1qY8cRYVaXpR9TCFKpFgzyKKtDiY0oT9lz8Z2ugH1BzV8tgXSj6ubRxonM3j50erc 7W46VR5DknlG5qy/UIYJx+puvPI3fNAB/E07tKzD+MX8AoAEa+sxdnbT7llVgG1Dob/6V2ojm DxOv0A==
Eero Tamminen schrieb:
What kind of cache we're talking about?
I know 030 has only 256 byte icache, and I haven't heard 68000 having
cache except it being mentioned few times in relation to MegaSTE with no
details (I though 68000 had just things like instruction pairing).
The MegaSTE has 16 kiB of cache, not inside the CPU of course, but on
the main board.
Regards
Christian
--
Christian Zietz - CHZ-Soft - czietz@xxxxxxx
WWW: https://www.chzsoft.de/
New GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x8708B34C827B159E