Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] cfg (8 vs 16 Mhz)
- From: Christian Zietz <czietz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:45:47 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1670579148; bh=VOYQ9+4m0sUSNeKfYAGYXfAC/H9u9URzlGa9zw2WGnM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=odFuJnNh1rdeJFQTIRgH1955a654gVbJ6/d7XcFCmcvffe+aG6uShEhQYOQy8bP9o guafzMdg+d++yd7e016DBRFkdDIyL0Ukam1uxdwJVtJxn3znH4DUHwTj/K3Tl8EdyW Xfdfl6tZQmGuU4sZHmL3TODy6/ngSjbWqJPqAqrPTtG597fknAb+gzFpNIOS/JEU8y Zf1VHhQXamE2DPVnhAO8Fd5Kk6cQBIpEzEat0ewBrwB3J6xxix2kQSdYQyOo2M3c94 XOI2wHIhJZcE9UVneBwO2kunPGCTb2PLyfILdMNdP72yBEURav98OWbGMAnK5Qwm7Q 4irowQq9x/xCg==
- Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:Rabe+VAuKcA=;KzgY6qh1Kjx+Bfeiv27UooGXEmD ONYbeGvUlLsgchZCt7fjb+v+mVXPLx9H8qkOznx5RIs+EUnuf5V/Aeeg7+JZQINSQ0FXLwojk fDOq9gBIafgLFnLITWqwcN4Mzh1SgJT9xx765bDZ5gfjsTHUEdxp5x3OWJ9Wf0HzTdXrhunZ+ k6arbIFqk0En7S2zZQ9p/bztGGGgYoWnSsNfT8G+YwnP4sufhtP1UWEbpvoVfENzCZum6Evax zoHNx/S4m6pNth6dSkyUS7AHX1TG8HiJWbShrxyao3vlnUqGRvGKMlLPdRXezYjQ7mlKTmUla h1YlP4YLn1jNl13X3ShWbnfCt35+oHTqmHL8zvICv3VQCywLMmi6ulOefm+4dr2W9aDOhTxsx DoCEaqfLS+rZh5Re94X/9/52vDoMYULIj8ntVEBw/X+u443wWlnAdhkebWE/eXq3BVI2LU+JV dxLzqRUmZrz+XXWSniMrKU/WAG+deyOmIkw1cIqWe4pbsX3DDcZwWatIpAzTnRg0J4RDNqiwX stWapnl6qDQ4O6pkedcBx7AHf0v9fivcgvqaCbTQgz+FnAHAKQBkpZ4Yt1AFPQs3ZyBWGZmG6 ZEnDq10CP1B4TXwJ9SoVx5yLTxAh5Bls2XxVAGxuzKAcR9qIPoxeZ3K+U0lE50YpuUigBJz+N 5QjOuGt+BmhTuH/zaReHEo4EF4yiiwO8tp2WvpUJaqBGkndBSWiayJMUHtXk+ai4iDlIOQGOy rHN8Lj4lexHlAYhlZ0/OPYheC+RwglsRu3r0XyB6riZ3ivvQvhAZkhgKXFikKc4/7QanQVaF2 YBMLEfuGapZQkAuCZQhUd4evRyKTL3rdthjIJyybHqCeyVh1bSR5CVWpf1S4BUktW9WfGAp+p ARFNzy5o4AErjvi1t26wq4eOBN2k4RjVjQmNpxEcMRHKxZ2YbQkto9bibnMUrr46WiAOcQUzU L5K/Gg==
Nicolas Pomarède schrieb:
good catch, it's true that most programs that want to go 16 MHz often
set cache too
Yes, because 16 MHz without cache doesn't bring a huge performance benefit..
Looking at the CoreMark results...
https://github.com/czietz/coremark/wiki/Results
.... it shows that from 8 MHz to 16 MHz *without* cache you only get a
boost of about 10%(!), whereas going from 8 MHz to 16 MHz *with* cache
brings you about +90%.
Regards
Christian
--
Christian Zietz - CHZ-Soft - czietz@xxxxxxx
WWW: https://www.chzsoft.de/
New GnuPG-Key-ID: 0x8708B34C827B159E