Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring? |

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

*To*: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?*From*: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:44:37 +0200*Dkim-signature*: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Qx2KUb6ul7L3OwEstabHpoujdgf1xqaOZBc3L+eaW6g=; b=kYsr7SrOUsJLb1y/wKmIr1PDXBRbdfNaWFWUuOnvH/n/turWy01fHFQS1v/HT3Gack rbB54DFN0YizeOIj5pxZPLmPAMn3kruqtsYVdh7wkBN2RFbrmQysbAt0I8JxGZ6POrrx F3x8cQs5yZGkZ3eZNrMZlUNJusNC/9cZlY0mw=*Domainkey-signature*: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=sPfQjpzJKN1hpp4PafLA4a9a0k1l1aMivwVwOKyQNxr3qGu3zblBYme3Z5GXgJjOBV UzdxdrNZ1k/LeMwOuDI31NEU2AOt8aodOYTt5VgndQKvW3MqwWX3FYvhEi0ny42GI4iz jHGGLBFAHc20LdchY/zqynHtsyNYLdpcjLQMo=

Hi Hauke, thanks for your work. here all geo_* tests compile and run fine. (gcc 4.5 64bits) gael On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It would be cool, if someone could verify that the geo_quaternion_x > tests are failing on gcc with my patch. I cannot reproduce this > behavior with MSVC and debugging with Cygwin is not really possible. > > - Hauke > > >

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**References**:**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Manuel Yguel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Messages sorted by:**[ date | thread ]- Prev by Date:
**[eigen] Getting to a solution from sparse matrices, Eigen3** - Next by Date:
**Re: [eigen] new tutorial on writing functions taking Eigen types as paramters** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?** - Next by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?**

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |