| Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?
- From: Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:39:35 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QHb4WH1QM93OIzmJFN3rP2cwdiNKfFvJbPCVciiNsT0=; b=nX97TD5fGWniDGa67U0PEdjogUMNu15qyQsSCqMYA9m8nhlPIq05SX4O/ohu690mv2 eiNW/XdJrpZJc8kn5ajRqLrqGcd6vpB5WGhdOSUIdyYl60nvcLdq6WPjgIwRD990sSAe pfMeQsqnFiC3sD4jqglj6zM2/yODsNOByj65s=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BMMXl+DKlO2Mp68arpXbcLKfj1orzuDxmm/r44/mm6R7rDAC2UZRU6UKRC2XsIOklJ lbk2aEsX5sYdFRwfqh6OAxXvLoPWweMi1j7edIBKlo3U6QD4kX8aNsX7D4xlhFAYueJV dJsX0EVIx8V5iXno1+PrvBsOocjDjb5I1oMhw=
Ok, first success message...
geo_transform build again and runs without errors
I am just running
geo_*
The new patch is attached, the changes are quite heavy because as Gael
pointed out on IRC, Isometry was not yet really supported.
- Hauke
Attachment:
geo.patch
Description: Binary data