Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring? |

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]

*To*: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*Subject*: Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?*From*: Hauke Heibel <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:40:00 +0200*Dkim-signature*: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KHkO8KO0KofhUwIIQ/PuScyLfdufnG0BKfY2QnhXiOI=; b=mA0pVd97U1nSx5f5jhuC/CsX40Ef3k//9k8QWQubjhy2R5Owa8m1MH9ftJbiE1TFGX 9I6tgiIGVCJjLY2Vf3woMlRut1lacSziUFM9E2YlhPXgxdKPZNJDU2ut69PX65bLpODV XD4VqGKqXlPm3b/uLHma7o8lRq3vbRpT+jlk4=*Domainkey-signature*: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=l3W4lWgxm5QNsyqP86OyrfrQLpIuOp4TCsF4OHweXie/DStvzbAEGWFR7yqgnMFt1H SV45ti2nUY7qooT3ElrrNE5j++ZT0/IKZ+hM68GcaWK+lvSioB2vfii5amAehHshdXI1 o5Y8jiOwGjsA+L1uNpczwADIWzOLaupOOsLJk=

I attached a final patch that also resolved the Map issues - this needs double checking before I push because the old test seemed to be way more complicated. - Hauke On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Hauke, > > thanks for your work. > > here all geo_* tests compile and run fine. (gcc 4.5 64bits) > > gael > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Hauke Heibel > <hauke.heibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It would be cool, if someone could verify that the geo_quaternion_x >> tests are failing on gcc with my patch. I cannot reproduce this >> behavior with MSVC and debugging with Cygwin is not really possible. >> >> - Hauke >> >> >> > > >

**Attachment:
geo.patch**

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**References**:**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Manuel Yguel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Benoit Jacob

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Hauke Heibel

**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?***From:*Gael Guennebaud

**Messages sorted by:**[ date | thread ]- Prev by Date:
**Re: [eigen] new tutorial on writing functions taking Eigen types as paramters** - Next by Date:
**Re: [eigen] gcc 4.2.4 warning on type-punned pointers** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?** - Next by thread:
**Re: [eigen] Do we need geometry refactoring?**

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |