| Re: [eigen] Re: proposal: call the Geometry module experimental |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] Re: proposal: call the Geometry module experimental
- From: Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:34:57 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LDCxz/Q47kydseH0qEBXEPKCKMk9CPC/yU/eodnWYsw=; b=hvx5PW+1hnejQZTW9JMeo2KYUHP12gsoA6J+4jG4JnmVg2DiJqg5vYijFkNotBSvxF jPtJMoImwIi7SKTWEjGOKjG/lWqsdnjdp6AtK7bfonoSfqcjnuWBeDGQ/eV9rMnFrJk+ 8lBYKm9EqTDuDX3sohwmO1hvih7/KF5FWF72k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qJI+KvWzZX1oGOHiowTUbakiiKua2Y5QgaWAqwNJzg02S9Lp1eUDEvqWXG8sy83+vr cfVXdeqr61Gs6/Ssziuv1vRW5C6iFkli95jVUdTNj3IVagZ5UXP9nEwc1lP15AtWykim +sypVn16KzoSCvg3FTgUg/+MVJpM7PL5ov6zI=
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now I would like to restate my initial request: can we please mark the
> Geometry module experimental? It doesn't have much disadvantage: we
> just make sure to actually preserve the 99.9% of the API, and 100% for
> Krita and other projects you might care about; but this allows us to
> improve the API without artificial constraints. Then for 2.1 we remove
> the experimental tag. I really don't think we should be having this
> discussion a couple of days before eternal API freeze.
I though that was clear, because of the existence of this discussion.
so yes let's mark the whole module experimental.