Re: truce

[Christopher Rogers <slaxemulator@xxxxxxxxx>]

I wanted things to say the way they are. /home/slitaz/cooking/packages is for cooking packages. This way /home/slitaz/cooking/chroot can be remove once you unmount everything.

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Indigo <pointofavailability@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As I struggle to understand all of this, all I meant is that it's
desirable to have the choice of using the current filesystem
(pressumable with changes, not from a package list), rather than
having to use the default rootfs.gz from the ISO -- but this is more
about installs, maybe, and gen-iso.  Agreed, though, a chroot is
definitely the way to go.

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Christophe Lincoln <pankso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> yes, the same package should be buildable on stable, cooking, or
>> custom rootfs.gz
>
> Exactly and this is not the case anymore since many receipt have been
> modified to work with new Tazwok without keeping backward compatibility.
>
>> -- makes sense for install, too, so one can use 'tazusb writefs' and
>> keep any customizations
>
> But for path, on a regular system all is build in /home/slitaz, if you
> use cooking it will use cooking package and create cooking ISO smae for
> stable. But if one want to cook or make ISO from stable using cooking
> stuff, it must create a chroot (path is not important) and work in it.
> Finally in the chroot you will also find slitaz stuff in /home/slitaz
>
> - Christophe
>
> ---
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
>

---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/