Re: [hatari-devel] test needed on a 4MB STF

[Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 22/12/2016 à 22:43, Christian Zietz a écrit :
> Nicolas Pomarède schrieb:
>
> > I agree, not really needed for emulation too, but it's true that when
> > you nearly have a description of the inner working of this part of the
> > MMU, it would be nice to understand the reason and duplicate even the
> > strangest effect :)
>
> I think I have now reverse-engineered how the access signals for the RAM
> banks are generated for the Ricoh (aka non-IMP) MMU. Phey, I fear I'm
> going to dream of logic gates and Boolean algebra tonight...
>
> I can indeed see the "hole" for the bank0=128k, bank1=2M configuration.
> No RAM access signals are generated for this configuration and A21..A18
> = 0001, which is exactly the address range from $40000 to $7ffff. I'll
> see if I can find some time during the holidays to transfer my
> hand-written notes into some kind of documentation of my findings.

Good news, this might be useful too for other project like MIST or 
similar which try to re-build a complete STF/STE with VHDL and require a 
low level description of each chip.

Nicolas