| Re: [eigen] If Eigen adds a tiny shared library (was: Malloc-free dynamic matrices) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] If Eigen adds a tiny shared library (was: Malloc-free dynamic matrices)
- From: Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:56:22 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cPW6Tw68dI4SGGCwggYl8D7+03j09obxECpD3bXlgpE=; b=Pd2C0hFoXfwk1XwuC+e1d82ilSDkeyNwvprBFOWLdWN6X0vnBaOOsSkTFp+JJTbvDD TRhXS7ufX9tKGs8yUjL1hoTx49JL+2yBr/VeCxDkv+SglFOwONBj4v0TPBdiymcRWH91 Hpcz7xVduzeVRDtFWt05yrjpfEG2uGTX07PaU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cPZSwv/N78neHmwK/gJvIglpG4Mk1LLthnxc3XgIKQ4UzEKiG1yTBlYr3G5hBiFVJ7 LxNdcxDH4j5GKOn2YIlqpe+/mW5Ln6vad2SQP68mSBiOuWBcs5p6p38RhOJwIhPSCIEw yh5PkZXolZNczxm4zTSd966wJ7dWavEHVXux8=
Malloc-free dynamic matrices. one of the last emails from me.
2010/3/5 Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>:
> No. What is the name of that thread?
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> me too. have you seen my big list of 10 reasons? (other thread)
>>
>> 2010/3/5 Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> My attraction for header only goes beyond the licensing issue.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Very good remarks, see my next-to-last email in that thread, i
>>>> actually mention that as one of many issues if we introduced even a
>>>> tiny binary lib. Basically it would have to be BSD/MIT licensed. Which
>>>> would pose more documentation/communication problems.
>>>>
>>>> Benoit
>>>>
>>>> 2010/3/5 Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> I think eigen should stick to it's header only roots. There are many
>>>>> advantages in this approach. At worst, add the shared lib in the
>>>>> unsupported folder.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM, FMDSPAM <fmdspam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> It appears to me, that if eigen is adding a (even tiny) shared library,
>>>>>> eigen is not a "header only lib" anymore, isn't it?
>>>>>> So I have to ask: Don't that imply problems (or additional issues) in
>>>>>> respect to LGPLv3 and closed source software?
>>>>>> I have to admit, I didn't know the answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S.
>>>>>> Special Thanks to Benoit for the LGPL-"Battle" with VTK people and the
>>>>>> therefore exhausted License FAQ!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Rohit Garg
>>>>>
>>>>> http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Senior Undergraduate
>>>>> Department of Physics
>>>>> Indian Institute of Technology
>>>>> Bombay
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rohit Garg
>>>
>>> http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>> Senior Undergraduate
>>> Department of Physics
>>> Indian Institute of Technology
>>> Bombay
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rohit Garg
>
> http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
>
> Senior Undergraduate
> Department of Physics
> Indian Institute of Technology
> Bombay
>
>
>