| Re: [eigen] If Eigen adds a tiny shared library (was: Malloc-free dynamic matrices) |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives
]
- To: eigen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [eigen] If Eigen adds a tiny shared library (was: Malloc-free dynamic matrices)
- From: Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:24:50 +0530
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=j7+FttQq/eFa0okShm9Djo4aF44LRj1w8BkODjiq1CU=; b=e+3wPP5FibpdSKGIJH//UiwY1WwE2tBv+jYoaU2OLMW/FRODPcYZ9P6Gv3+5rnqIFo vIAR41qSxUBcsqYmfFraA2Tsn/urmuxOvtwE5PYuWrLV9rYgHoiHzy49HZKOsg7qCoYe dObjK3GR1upyU5XLYoJjYZAom0Hs5my/KGQ2A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=YF7btkW0ZWqEnIuNE4SG/Oa6gozAb8Pf8ve9qvsFtGP6oY1NsCP2m6DfMERG+6kByh m13xApy7KNDJZg6OpH6HDDgVq3vUWiUyadXiTKgrLnAVb9U9ZRAf2KIsNHzKVPlEhGEQ PikgIKD855jBUsgo/HIaLYfOPP1NCpjHaXjtA=
No. What is the name of that thread?
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> me too. have you seen my big list of 10 reasons? (other thread)
>
> 2010/3/5 Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> My attraction for header only goes beyond the licensing issue.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoit.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Very good remarks, see my next-to-last email in that thread, i
>>> actually mention that as one of many issues if we introduced even a
>>> tiny binary lib. Basically it would have to be BSD/MIT licensed. Which
>>> would pose more documentation/communication problems.
>>>
>>> Benoit
>>>
>>> 2010/3/5 Rohit Garg <rpg.314@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> I think eigen should stick to it's header only roots. There are many
>>>> advantages in this approach. At worst, add the shared lib in the
>>>> unsupported folder.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM, FMDSPAM <fmdspam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> It appears to me, that if eigen is adding a (even tiny) shared library,
>>>>> eigen is not a "header only lib" anymore, isn't it?
>>>>> So I have to ask: Don't that imply problems (or additional issues) in
>>>>> respect to LGPLv3 and closed source software?
>>>>> I have to admit, I didn't know the answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.
>>>>> Special Thanks to Benoit for the LGPL-"Battle" with VTK people and the
>>>>> therefore exhausted License FAQ!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rohit Garg
>>>>
>>>> http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>> Senior Undergraduate
>>>> Department of Physics
>>>> Indian Institute of Technology
>>>> Bombay
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rohit Garg
>>
>> http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
>>
>> Senior Undergraduate
>> Department of Physics
>> Indian Institute of Technology
>> Bombay
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Rohit Garg
http://rpg-314.blogspot.com/
Senior Undergraduate
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology
Bombay