| Re: [AD] giftware license |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
- To: alleg-developers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [AD] giftware license
- From: Matthew Leverton <meffer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:45:14 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=fT8z9R3pUBXRf8qMrSMnS1ezzzw9uT65rjn5x/xfTiMP8hSXLlZ1mnWqJ5lpYUxxDiAH6ZAzZhGuLdLR9TbBBo2CJarsVtlEKJCoRwTSzKj8LxheGx0KKrAQM2Ogl/+4wFgx8XuP/SYv+KqNDMfi3Ma3Ie/pthCppPqHpREvh3A
By that reasoning, Allegro is not giftware, but is still "swapware" or
whatever the original license was...
--
Matthew Leverton - matthew@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.allegro.cc
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:23:44 +0200, Michal Molhanec <michal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Elias Pschernig wrote:
> >>"You can modify Allegro and distribute the modified Allegro under any
> >>licence you want, *but the original unmodified parts will still be
> >>licenced under the Allegro licence*."
> >>
> >>The *starred* part doesn't make any sense to me. What's it supposed to
> >>mean?
>
> it tries to say: "what was published under allegro licence will always
> be licenced under the allegro licence". the wording may not be clear so
> propose better :-)
>