Re: [AD] giftware license

[Elias Pschernig <elias@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:10 +1000, Peter Wang wrote:

> old:
> The Allegro licence is absolutely clear unless you are a a lawyer. 
> However it's written quite informal so this mini-FAQ tries to clarify 
> some things.
> 
> change to:
> The Allegro licence is absolutely clear unless you are a lawyer.  
> However, it's written quite informally so this mini-FAQ tries to clarify 
> some things.
> 

ok (no idea where that a came from)

> compatible _with_: "It clearly is compatible to all the points in the OSD"
> 

ok

> 
> "You can modify Allegro and distribute the modified Allegro under any 
> licence you want, *but the original unmodified parts will still be 
> licenced under the Allegro licence*."
> 
> The *starred* part doesn't make any sense to me.  What's it supposed to 
> mean?
> 

No idea. But it was explained earlier in the thread.

> 
> Change "We are programmers not lawyers." to "<b><blink>We are 
> programmers, not lawyers.</blink></b>"
> 

Hehe. I think <blink> is deprecated in HTML. Isn't there something
already in the CSS which could be used?

-- 
Elias Pschernig