| Re: [AD] Proposal for new branch |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives
]
Angelo Mottola wrote:
Hmm, this depends on the implementation of al_rest(), in
src/unix/utimer.c.
It currently uses select(). I #ifdeffed the MacOS X case, making it
use usleep() and now it works correctly...
Ok, cool.
Anyway, I was looking at your code; I'm not sure if it'd be better to
stick with vtables rather than implementing the needed functions
directly for every port, as you currently do. A lot of code is
duplicated this way, isn't it?
Yes. A lot of the duplicated code should be merged together eventually.
vtables introduce overhead and are annoying (for reading, writing,
experimenting, debugging...), so I didn't want to use them
unnecessarily. But we can return to them later, if desired.
Peter