| Re: [translations] updating an up-to-date file?!? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] updating an up-to-date file?!?
- From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:43:03 +0100
- Cc: Jean-Charles Malahieude <lilyfan@xxxxxxxxx>, Translations list at lilynet <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TElyADiWI++4DaEBMcmBv5TOrGm3cnyCtdEMMwi1hsU=; b=ezyE0C0O+QYEUUbgwBO0uDTzmAojaw67E0tNE0wnEGJOcn1CTN8RZWUIjeUaU9KwFT JnubN8p5QeqYjEyf01IE+6AXUyOWT9wjs/su3IXHrQCFt1n7TpR5WhOnSj/9mVrOdyAR i35IdjJskgbTMh3K1V7lU0LnfULAcZmA9Fj1M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZtxgqNTr+EkHXBcUoGTp16jI490wHVKRiE5fq3gFGDTtz5r7bZKeAuXEj5Xq5jsWKw +CRu3GKdb2CXdJJLAHEOGd4RFT4ms+u59JlMIJWVtEyGVKUWG9POk3lw8dLIb368AmKT TWkf+UsD47Iw6UdYqejaV8KkJ2YEnzk3rRojU=
2010/11/28 Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Il giorno sab, 27/11/2010 alle 23.41 +0100, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
>> > Francisco, would you mind having a look at it?
>>
>> Documentation is [maybe too] abbreviated in this case. The example
>> just shows what has to be added to the command line for checking some
>> given files. But the part 'make [whatever] check-translation' must be
>> understood as 'make ISOLANG=[your language id] check-translation'.
>> Different options to achieve a given result have to be taken as added
>> to the command line as options. It is easier and more readable not to
>> put always every possible option in examples.
>
> This is not straightforward for those (like me) who know nothing about
> make files.
>
> Also, in that page (CG 4.8.3) ISOLANG=MY_LANGUAGE is always specified
> except for commands using CHECKED_FILES=
>
> I could think that there's no need to add ISOLANG= because the script
> can set automatically the language by looking at the path of the file
> I'm checking (CHECKED_FILES=MY_LANGUAGE/manual/foo.itely).
On second thought, I think you're right, setting checked_files makes
isolang=it useless.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com