| Re: Cookutils - New tools to cook packages |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
On Fri, 6 May 2011 02:15:40 +0200
Christophe Lincoln <pankso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > layer in receipts. Obviously, people who don't care about tazwok will
> > eventually broke it, often or not. Given I don't have so much time &
> > internet connection theses days, and maybe until automn, there's a
> > probability that when I get a new opportunity to works on code
> > seriously all will be hardly broken and 6 monthes of hard works will
> > be trashed out. There's also good chances that in that time you take
> > the decision to trash out all tazwok compatibility because it's
> > bloated too.
>
> Oh!!! And when you modified receipt and add your tazwok specific code
> in them (report, etc), did you think compatibility ? It was not a
> problem for you to break them and make them unusable with stable 3.0
> Tazwok. You even not got 6 mounth to break everything, in 2 month you
> did it. I mean in 2 month lot of receiptwas usable only with your
> vision of Tazwok and know you afris we break things when you not
> here... let me think, finally should I bother about compatiblity when
> you did'n ?
If you really ask me, I'll answer that you can act as me or accusate me
for the way I act, but not the both. Anyway you probably don't really
wait an answer from me on this subject so do what you want and be happy
with it. Unluckily I don't have the possibility to maintain tank myself
so things are almost done.
I'm back on the roads tomorow, bye.
--
GoKhlaYeh <gokhlayeh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/