| Re: 4 new receipts in the wok & misc |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
>
>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:41:15 +0200 (CEST)
>> "MilkaJinka" <milka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>> Helloo,
>>
>>> I've just added 4 new receipts in the wok, and need a little help on
>>> these:
>>>
>>> - bozohttpd: doesn't want to go in the right place (the binary ends up
>>> in
>>> $fs/usr and not $fs/usr/bin, I don't know why), otherwise looks OK
>>>
>> Done: http://hg.slitaz.org/wok/rev/9d3578b1f87d
>
> Thanks :-) I'm not familiar enough with receipts... The only way to
> improve it to write more of them ^^
>
>>
>>> - haserl: two versions of the package: without lua support (20ko) or
>>> with
>>> lua support (140ko). But it can't get them to adopt different names
>>> from
>>> each other for the executable and for the package name (to avoid
>>> owerwriting)
>>>
>> For me is not chocking.
>> For the the receipt you can have:
>> [code]
>> PACKAGE="haserl-lua"
>> SOURCE="haserl"
>> TARBALL="$SOURCE-$VERSION.tar.gz"
>> [/code]
>>
>> If necessary redifine $src and $_pkg.
>>
>> For the binary try to rename: cp -a $_pkg/usr/bin/haserl
>> $fs/usr/bin/$PACKAGE
>>
>>
>
> I tried something like that, but I guess it was too late for my neurons to
> be efficient...
>
>>> - o3read: package looks OK. I planned to write a short "ODFbox" tool
>>> using
>>> it, but I'll wait to see if Busybox's unzip - which I use to extract
>>> the
>>> content from an ODF file - will be fixed in a future version (it keeps
>>> complaining about a bad magic number). Otherwise I will use the
>>> full-featured unzip.
>>>
>> I think you can use the full-featured unzip.
>> Have you report the bug to Busybox developper Team ?
>
> Yep, *full* unzip seems quite lightweight. For the Busybox version, I've
> read several notices of the problem on mailing-lists, but there is no
> entry on their bug reporting tool... I'll fill a report right now.
Done : http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=4334
>>>
>>> Oh, and maybe you'll want to check out VL-hot / vxmount (
>>> http://code.google.com/p/vxmount/ ) from VectorLinux. It allows to
>>> automount many kinds of devices without using HAL, only udev. I didn't
>>> find the sources, but udev rules are in the package, maybe we could use
>>> them for udev/mdev.
>>>
>>> --
>>> MilkaJinka
>>>
>>> ---
>>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Joseph-Alexandre <erjo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>>
> Have a good week-end
>
> --
> MilkaJinka
>
> ---
> SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/
>
--
Konstelacioj, entre ciel éther -> http://konstelacioj.info/
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/