| Re: [hatari-devel] Possible bug in CPU emulation? |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] Possible bug in CPU emulation?
- From: Uwe Seimet <Uwe.Seimet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 20:18:13 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1570558693; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=seimet.de; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=iq/W3O2xmHr+nBpMfw4rVmL97P9YcAU1Ox1ssWRxJ5k=; b=f6XiQDCZ8nbRIgCEjEx8T3OWEmkQwO64gL3f0BeLdcQTGMn7/2dlwyPj1Yti51PVcu uPYtxYabm96vXUpd+1bIqWs1ebdCwq4MX0chFZb6AOLn0RA0iNMTYQ827Dn+54DTa2CE RJnGJ1XoLJNMbNYFxTu3SbBzVucLKcsm3pqMaIivH4FfBUWJq6dVzg2s8BMWo2H6XNBz pteH0NTARQcbXe5mBSkchB4K0WUbSzKuXs5LuenotZbHUXB7P4W7jeKj8y/9VB8pUKFK xwHH9450uEY+JifeinS9YqhlMuvJWxMmbR5quIg7gLoJaHDkWX47VqkD0J+/3DwLjyxj gfug==
Hi,
> Tracing SCSI/ACSI commands and DMA register access with Hatari reveals
> that with Rwabs any access is split into multiples of 127 (not even 255)
> sectors. CBHD handles this incorrectly just with XHDI. I'm not going to
> dig into CBHD to find out why -- unless someone comes up with the source
> code.
>
> Probably XHDI isn't used that much. Or CBHD itself isn't used that much.
In any case, if CBHD does the same when writing (and not just reading) data
this is a rather dangerous bug.
Best regards
Uwe