Re: [hatari-devel] Is it me or the new hatari release is slow ?

[Nicolas Pomarède <npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 02/06/2014 00:50, Laurent Sallafranque a écrit :
> OK, I've uploaded a fix which resynchronize the table with the current
> CPU31 instructions.
>
> There were some unuseful instructions that may have been removed by a
> previous change I removed too from the table.
> Everything works OK now (as before the change number 5007).

OK, but why don't you use the 16 bit opcode as a key to your cycles' 
table instead of having a static version ? (I guess you have a small 
program to generate this ?)

Just create a table with 65536 entries and populate it for each entry 
where you want to have some specific timings ; for all the other 
opcodes, leave some "-1" values for example in the entries.

This way, changing opcode in cpuemu.c won't alter your table.

Nicolas