| RE: [hatari-devel] ST/STE High Resolution Scaling |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: <hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [hatari-devel] ST/STE High Resolution Scaling
- From: "Randy Hunsaker" <hunsra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:10:39 -0700
- Cc: "'Thomas Huth'" <th.huth@xxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1379099435; bh=OPiYsQxeZqebWQrsh3/CrYEvL6CYWtFAUuxn2yz1lLc=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=hOPqC7bdkvnlbUNFo6zWNn4Lzket4u0/LuE1c2KN7ymCiuW5K/68qjm62kGquucQD r8VgEH2TmMZ48ZGvsk8LeVZzPXxu85JalXJMXA3BUIFqjrJqTSRSZ2b2QcXF89OXNo pFGYPvmNDrkEgPjxeyC6Pc9pp1+jOX6kRYfS7BVqFaiaRB5b2RF3/TlkzuWkJjkQME vmXOnMabToleknwbZO89mx8PzQu18moOdxeeINhiSoYEp68LWyTOEyidTO+ZMVm10W PnCLqqE7H7ztzFf703axCp1B+/Iu3FcBPOl+909tTJajHD73WM4foVUgX+N4qw2Us9 eZx0Wx++xA+3Q==
- Thread-index: AQHt3VWsDIbzWAK1h1B9zom1IpF8pAG/zW6DAicmZ+4CGBxoywHh7/FaAmSITVqZM4K8sA==
I'll investigate SDL 2.0 as well. If SDL 1.2 will handle it, I'll stick with that to minimize the changes.
Thanks,
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas Pomarède [mailto:npomarede@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:48 AM
To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] ST/STE High Resolution Scaling
On 13/09/2013 20:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
> I haven't had a really close look at SDL2.0 yet, but what I've read so
> far sounds like we would getting the scaling for free if we switch to
> SDL2.0. So maybe we should include SDL2.0 support instead?
>
Yes, maybe that another possible option. Problem is that SDL 2.0 is not very widespread yet, but we could have different codes depending on whether cmake detected SDL1 or SDL2.
I haven't look that much at SDL2 too, but I think SDL1 already allowed zooming bitmap, the difference is that SDL2 internal structure is now allowing easier access to automatic hardware zooming when available.
Nicolas
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3408 / Virus Database: 3222/6663 - Release Date: 09/13/13