Re: [eigen] Eigen and rigid body simulation |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/eigen Archives ]
If that happened, would you still want to have this stuff in Eigen or would your rather use KDL for that? Since you were able to reformulate above everything in terms of Lie algebra and without any mechanics, it seems like this is now really interesting to have in Eigen, independently of the particular use case you had in mind, but I also don't want to do it if its main author (you) is going to not use it in the future because KDL does it!
I think that these elements have to be in Eigen. Actually, I'm speaking with Maxime Tournier who had an interesting implementation of such elements. Basically, he has some classes describing Lie groups and Lie algebras and their operations. They are specialized for certain type :
struct Lie<Quaternion> <- rotation3Dstruct Lie<Matrix<Scalar, 1, 7> > <- 3d direct isometries (maybe Matrix is not a good choice)
This approach is interesting, since it describes the group structure.so, the definition I proposed may change to better reflect the geometrical aspect of these elements.
-- Mathieu
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |