[AD] Re: Allegro and C#

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


It sounds reasonable to me. Right now I'm busy with the work around
the new DotGNU Just-In-Time Compiler, but I will be keep looking to do
some scratches of the C# bindings... It is really appealing...


Cheers,
Kirill.

> On Saturday 07 January 2006 23:19, Kalle Last wrote:
> > I don't think C# bindings have to be officially supported straight from
> the
> > beginning. That would mean the development of next Allegro version would
> > take considerably more time. What could be done is that someone develops
> > standalone wrapper and when it can be considered stable it could be
> > incorporated to e.g official addon, something similar to GUI and some
> other
> > things might become in the 4.4/4.6 version or as AllegroGL is at the
> moment.
>
> Sounds reasonable.
>
> > In short, I don't think many of the current devs are willing to code on
> the
> > C# wrapper.
>
> I think that's probably a fair assesment. I'm certainly not going to spend
> time on it (my interest in C#, or C++++ as I'm told Microsoft secretly
> meant to call it, being zero).
>
> > If anyone likes to have C# bindings (s)he must do them itself.
>
> Actually, that pretty much goes for any feature in an open source project:
> if you want something, well, someone has to write it. You might as well do
> it yourself and help out (while making sure that the thing is actually how
> you wanted it to be)! :)
>
> Evert
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> --
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers
>




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/