Re: [AD] acquire_bitmap weirdness

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]


Elias Pschernig wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 07:22 -0800, Robert Ohannessian wrote:

This is the wrong approach. What happens when putpixel() becomes
hardware accelerated and needs an unlocked bitmap?


Will this happen for 4.2.x?

Probably not. But I don't want to have to go back and recode all my apps every time I upgrade Allegro.



he same question applied to any and all Allegro functions that we
might have recommended users to put in between acquire/release pair.

Secondly, for the last 5 years or so, the docs and the community have
always recommended writing the code I had below, even when hardware
accelerated blits were used. Changing this behavior to make it slower
will negatively affect hundreds (if not more) of Allegro applications.


Ok. But it wouldn't hurt changing the docs like in my patch, somewhat
hiding the odd current behavior :) I mean, there's a note stating the
automatic unlocking, and old code will keep working. And it generally
advices to not use the function at all.. but maybe I should shorten it
all somewhat?


Up to you.




Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/