Re: [AD] Color convertors |
[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.liballeg.org/allegro-developers Archives ]
In reply to Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@xxxxxxxxxx>: >I wrote: >> Since we already figure out what the CPU is, why not have different >> versions of code for different CPUs? We already do this to a limited >> extent (cpu_mmx et al.), so this would simply be an extension. > >But we already have different versions ! >The blit() routines for example are (partially) written in pure 386 asm for >Pentium, MMX asm for MMX-enabled CPUs and SSE asm for SSE-enabled CPUs. I >don't think we could do much better. I meant writing code for specific CPUs (for instance, an optimization on a Pentium might be unnecessary on a i686, and might even slow down a K6). This is just a minor extension to the current scheme. I thought of doing this after following the discussion about how the new color convertor code affected different CPUs. Bye for now, -- Laurence Withers, lwithers@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.lwithers.demon.co.uk/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ | http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/ |