| Re: [translations] how to handle snippets commit if you don't have push access |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] how to handle snippets commit if you don't have push access
- From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:26:07 +0100
- Cc: LilyPond Translation <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wVSOeeoCfDwfHscM9Y93Ar/U9f8vX5Fiw8Bmc3+EyQI=; b=LHOGix3ldrnysM+seuHrQUuBAHY0wHheCAZ8R/JPv817b3pSLm2mMLQm6jmUn6UO8P Jfm4J0yFzJ8QS8iyEid9CkNDnDO9E+vCDWYhonrxX5QqfJCE8Ml64UmDx3ZMd8+ABhC2 u8EbbdOQeN172FiXk7Yt8xd1yCgmB1+vNu6ac=
2012/1/30 Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I have done it. the word COMMITTISH goes into snippets/*.ly, I'm not
>> sure this is desirable
>
>
> please revert
> as explained before I was wrong: I think that I must run makelsr
>
> should I change the patch and replace COMMITTISH with something else (what?)
>
> sorry, management of snippets still sounds complicated to me
Reverting leaves a revert commit as well. Check out 8337a3e91a2 , test
it and we'll think a more compact method.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com