| Re: [translations] how to handle snippets commit if you don't have push access |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lilynet.net/translations Archives
]
- To: Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [translations] how to handle snippets commit if you don't have push access
- From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:44:35 +0100
- Cc: LilyPond Translation <translations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bZIL03OWINXdIGXcr9otDw1y4lD7eBes9wLLE+ThfaU=; b=cd/x5S+4DTMhLYivGohFSgPeufu8jbPl3ukoIow3u5hrJaNloOMljG7i8Z7/6eBU1W 7jMNn/OwtgqAw3YiISfgSMhFf9i4rM6Lfp/s4JwAUCrBf9NWOf9CTFGrY9abBRRo0RMI mDV/RZP2I5NuYKDYbejLEwlxGpN1KNpZCLYHk=
2012/1/5 Federico Bruni <fedelogy@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> I've just sent the first chapter of NR to the italian proofreader.
> While waiting for his feedback, I have a few questions about the patches
> that I'll have to send.
>
> It's all about the snippets management, which caused me some headache a
> couple of months ago:
> http://lilypond-translations.3384276.n2.nabble.com/CG-5-8-3-updating-committish-of-lsr-snippets-td6852329.html
>
> I'm thinking about sending two patches first and then a third after the two
> are applied.
> The first two patches will be:
>
> 1) files related to notation manual
> 2) snippets updated by makelsr
>
> I think it's better to split them, right?
Right.
> The third:
>
> 3) my .texidoc files containing the committish generated by Francisco when
> committing patch 2.
As an alternative: include your .texidocs in patch 2 with the
committish unaltered, then the new committishes in patch 3.
This patch 3 would contain changes in committishes only. Also, patch
2 would not contain diffs in committishes. So, the overall size of the
patch set would be nearly the same.
> The reason is: I can't place the committish of my local commit, because,
> since I don't push the patch, the real committish will be different (BTW, as
> I don't have push access, my local committishes are always bad objects).
Probably. Makes sense but I have not verified that. I believe you
because you have experienced it many times.
> I think also that I'd better update the committish of all the other
> it/*.texidoc files in order to stop check-translation to put garbage in the
> diff :)
I am not sure this is necessary but it is easy to do, theoretically
harmless and it has advantages because simplifies things. The drawback
is, the patch is unnecessarily big.
> Of course, after checking that nothing has changed in the title or in the
> description of the snippets.
>
> Does it make sense?
At a glance, I'd say yes.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com