| Re: Blending edge ISO - 2 |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Blending edge ISO - 2
- From: Daniele Guerrieri <d.guerrieri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:00:20 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7q6AxLZd2Fnz9AFadDAl9CLBwTTXPvEdRnLRiaiaSYI=; b=pEz/eOBnmKtzoGXz6PtVi8UojuKDKMSOeKu7p/41T9IesiLw2pMiKkhr+qwry/YHVd Yd/GMluB8VSFe7vckVgJstm6fDu8Tx2hXbki6JILptj/kRSrj88X0JZQsg2xQFjUvcKl go93TELuNfDBBVVL/rlVl7p+mMKWb9wwBOmH0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HUHUWUpJX0YkHd+DOMqq9fscOmuWUapJJnk7k8oOLhN7jvvs8KTgzXJaPkIagiiBoZ TnVqVKVjMzrDnm3/HomuCG2kFswmCx5/IEueJNs8tPLRXDh74lGFs4p33C3Ktn8KJHxt VDw75ypWR8V8wOduuNZtyVPk5G6rbbhAIczxc=
> Make me nearly cry... What is strange is that now we use CONFIG_M386 but
> if I do a 'uname -a' I got i686. I say that because we though these
> kernel panic came from our new kernel and the config M486, but it seems
> not.
>
But is uname's output of 686 related to CONFIG_M**386***? i think
not, uname -m prints out machine processor, i think config_M486
is an optimization; have you tried with i386? and what about CONFIG_X86_GENERIC?
> We can't say M386 dropped hardware support since you got a fairly new
> processor. So next I think we must try to upgrade the kernel since
> 2.3.37 may be buggy in this area.
>
> - Christophe
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/