[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: HPC-Europa
- From: Ikem Krueger <ikem.krueger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:03:05 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4PRnMm1PLxn+QFAoNlppDtcUvrkHGNCdq3z9O/QZPk0=; b=U+3U3l4Y26cL6lMUsY/DHy7jFy7LhG21J+l0Olmj2hceH6k/NnqcNlJqiTD2qoBgdS 3OoM4RoUrYf/I9O67siNuJD5jyA7c1abKBEnMibyJhnQFJ0t8GifiBnRMb8ovvR3zHr3 DyWuDcORDxy/tfFV2SGQQpQA6NSlGLhWNr0WY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=x17rXqwEbrl462fGhyvRtaAlMm/Phk0Hyz3i4G/7CpLOyFH2l34pdOx8bBP83VslZF wDZN/Uco9IoMegm9sRbyrKraEPRTWI+zbEBirMI48GQ1fjP6T5tAmXwX1NmlqkbVnMJ2 whvjqXAULiTg/nUMBS61TCACt1HYIgQJHPTqo=
> 2011/1/25 Alexander Medvedev <devl547@xxxxxxxxx>:
>And with ulibc/busybox as core
> I had the same idea not long ago. Too bad I cannot create a usable minimal
> system myself..
I had also the idea, to ship it with glibc too. So you don't need to
recompile the whole system. Heck, I had in mind to recompile glibc,
bash, with ulibc. So it's small AND compatible. :D
> I have a spare server for a build tank, if ultra-light uclibc flavor project
> will be started (after 4.0 release ^^).
What does that mean? :)
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/