Re: [cooking] various boot modes, successes and failures

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


On 23/12/2010 17:40, Philippe Lelédy wrote:
On 22/12/2010 18:42, Philippe Lelédy wrote:
On 22/12/2010 17:09, Christopher Rogers wrote:
The squashfs+xz is not build into kernel. Its build as a module.
I built again with gen-distro and now, *all work fine*. -- don't know why. My ram-iso is gunziped
A try with tazlito-3.3 and xz compression gave me the same results as the issue http://labs.slitaz.org/issues/356#note-3. So the boot and unpack is OK with 572M or less RAM, but kernel bugs with 573M or more RAM. Because my FS is 422M, it leaves little RAM (119M) for executing programs and slim loops with try and failure. Ctl+Backspace gives a text login screen which permits startx, and the system works very well.

So http://labs.slitaz.org/issues/356 is not solved by xz replacing lzma.

On more thing about tazlito-3.3, http://labs.slitaz.org/issues/364#change-746 is supposed to be closed after my suggestion but my experiment showed me a CPU at 50% not 100%.

Ph.Lelédy



---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/