Re: udev fixed, but not xorg

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives ]


it was not the end - I checked again and found that I was remembering only half of mojos post:

the solution is:

50-udev-default.rules

KERNEL=="nvidia*|nvidiactl*",   GROUP="video"
after this line add:
KERNEL=="card[0-9]*",   NAME="dri/%k", GROUP="video"

it was already posted here: http://forum.slitaz.org/index.php?p=/discussion/1883

it still remains the low values of glxgears for the inteldriver

tux@slitaz:~$ glxgears
299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.670 FPS
300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.821 FPS

should be

monika@fluxflux: ~ $ glxgears
1985 frames in 5.0 seconds = 396.521 FPS
2053 frames in 5.0 seconds = 410.139 FPS

and the radeon driver still starts with Rasterizer and crashes If I want to reload X


Am 27.12.2010 13:38, schrieb Thomas Hinterberger:
conclusion of the tests of the last days

tazx works much better than in 3.0, but the problems with direct rendering are the same - out of the box SliTaz uses always Rasterizer

as mojo pointed out in one post, this it is a problem with /dev/dri/card0, because when changing the ownership of /dev/dri recursive to tux, the correct rendering software is used. But this seem to work only with intel drivers, because the radeon driver crashes, as soon as I do this ... (at least I could not test more.)

So I decided to see the ownership of /dev/dri/card0 in other distros - this seems to be ok

tux@slitaz: ~ $ ls -l /dev/dri/card0
crw-rw---- 1 root video 226, 0 2010-12-27 11:39 /dev/dri/card0

PClinuxOS is the same as SliTaz - FluxFlux (Slackware) is a little bit different

tom@ff-sl: ~ $ ls -l /dev/dri/card0
crw-rw-rw- 1 root video 226, 0 2010-12-27 12:11 /dev/dri/card0

so it must be a problem with group

the significant difference between Slitaz and other distros is, that in other distros, there is always another user than tux in the group video - like in PClinuxOS it is mysql - in slackware it is root

Here is really the end of my linux knowledge


Am 26.12.2010 17:49, schrieb GoKhlaYeh:
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 06:46:33 -0800
Indigo<pointofavailability@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

I think the conflict stems from the widescreen display on my laptop,
sadly... and I feel a little stupid for not even thinking about that
Well played, looks like you're right (same case here).




---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/





---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/


Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+ http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/