[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/slitaz Archives
]
- To: slitaz <slitaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: some thoughts on gcc
- From: Alexander Medvedev <devl547@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:12:00 +0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rZLCuCRtbT2iF9Ydj+8DazCgcgRQ3woTEYRPTDnCPWY=; b=lDqRUjcPxspI41BrYl1yVl3CtnIffD9zsdUxsXGT55KGJ6pX8KY2iDoXMdWde+ssmn qUcLXnbq9vOv1te+nHz+j+RhlT7wEOSbdl47gbxrTlSaw7l2ZkyPR2ilQph5rLPRdADH 8ELXxYljOnzqTTQBPustNOqIXCOtooieQCmg4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=phAWCapYNNGWLux4Ova3/aGbuRLTzopP9nzbH2NLlIVROMyTPRivgZhV1V01BoznY8 z5RfCyjs3sHmxTkXuPnbWMsGYmtUEscZI52Km8S8QBvtbm6NbZkU/DUTQ5mMXUNerB+r 7TnzGx0s8RXk/VLCEJm/Euy2PUCItl/j6J4Pc=
Looking strange:
1. we have standart gcc receipt with (--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran)
2. we have gcc+gcj receipt with (--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,java)
Why do we have objective C in gcc+gcj?
Also, why do we have fortran and objC in standart receipt?
Looks like it's time to split it to gcc-lite (with only c and c++ that
will suffice 99% of users) and gcc-full that 1% may need.
p.s. found with-tune=i486 string.. Time to forget about anything below
standart pentium. Even ultralite distros dont boot on 486 nowadays.
Everything above this text is just my IMHO
With best regards, Alexander.
---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/