Re: Documentation Sprint

[Rohit Joshi <rj.rohit@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ben,

> template for various parts, or any standards or advice we may dream up
> in terms of "Problem / Symptoms / Solution / Notes"
I think this can either go in FAQ or troubleshooting sub-sections for
each page. We can also just add a link to the relevant forum post.

> As I side note, I'll take out the 'claiming' idea.
I think its ok to leave the sidenote. You proposed it.  We like your
idea and love that you are taking a lead to initiate this.

> Just a 'get it done' approach, after which we can review them. Kinda wanted it to be right
> first

Yes, many documents needs to be updated/added. If a user doesn't feel
comfortable editing a particular document, just add the comments in
the review section. Any person who knows the answer to the problem can
edit and improve  the document.

Thanks

Rohit


On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Ben Arnold <iamseawolf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Rohit --
>
> On Tuesday 04 May 2010 02:41:55 Rohit Joshi wrote:
>> Why wait till August?? Lets get started asap (before the world
>> cup). We have already discussed among ourselves and given thumbs
>> up to the idea.
>> I think lets just give everybody freedom to improve/add/edit any
>> wiki pages. Every page can be read and reviewed by anyone.
>> Once the wiki documentation is written, we will pen down the
>> process of reviewing.
>
> I was planning only the actual sprint for August (perhaps a little far
> ahead, admittedly), the fortnight or so. I was hoping to get a few
> more people form the community involved beforehand with deciding the
> most important pages etc. It would also be a chance to outline a
> template for various parts, or any standards or advice we may dream up
> in terms of "Problem / Symptoms / Solution / Notes" or whatever is
> relevant. @Spork has mentioned it s a comment to my post (1) so
> thought it may be worth discussing.
>
> I agree there should be no reason for anybody to update the docs as
> and when they wish! I'm sure many, including yourself, do; we can do
> nothing without information from anyone that can give it. This is just
> to get a handful completed and up to par with useful expectations :)
>
> As I side note, I'll take out the 'claiming' idea. Hopefully that'll
> encourage a bit more activity an won't mean anyone thinking they need
> permission. Think I was thinking a bit too big! Just a 'get it done'
> approach, after which we can review them. Kinda wanted it to be right
> first
>
>
>> PS: Please take care of "namespaces" in wiki.
>
> Do you mean, make sure I know they are there or take more care about
> where i put pages? I put this initial draft in the Scratchbook as it's
> more about the distro process, rather than a guide to getting
> something working. Feel free to move it (anybody) if it's in the wrong
> place.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> --
>
>  1: http://community.slitaz.org/node/128#comment-52
>
> --
>
> Ben Arnold
> Chester, UK
>
> e: ben at seawolfsanctuary.com
> w: seawolfsanctuary.com | t: @seawolf
>
> nom = { :cookies => :mouth }
> nom; nom; nom
>
>

---
SliTaz GNU/Linux Mailing list - http://www.slitaz.org/