Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git

[ Thread Index | Date Index | More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives ]

To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git
From: Ingolf Wagner <palipalo9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:01:13 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=miJVtvSyFcbPxKkaLVq6qXKh4qDrm1IzB8dBaTwEmCE=; b=RHqvKDg5jZmatS8H2k9Iue63aT4jk39SB/KOw5VL3hMl6C6WW8hqopKSTxB95BMvQr mjPS4M16bhG1TJhYQMfzKCj5+BMHEkvzxfrIFUkka3DIhcOF9Be0N9xywgdCNcfSnL+j HR20kJK65ugzXCZSddFgnMLNw1BUs7gsBG+96ZguT9CMHT7C6eXlUANZErRpERZZ2fgw KqZMV4JQOv9XsVdEAXdXvJyVN6ajvHLotyZsvHSHcPTG8799IRoNHFvsct6kxtF/+Ca9 LoIFTV682iAKDP8x1oocMGI05qwNNJuZDcAc8CBzGBW+wLW1lCvBLW7c8dl+pBGQx8pB iI/A==

OK, I think I was riding something of an adrenaline high and read too much
into your conversion attempt.

Well I would love to do it, but my knowledge of svn to git, and all that stuff around layman and gentoo overlays is not good (yet). I love help, but I will not be the driving force here.

>Yeah I guess so, but PRs are quite good I think.

Definitely! I wasn't arguing against using branches and PRs, but was mainly
thinking that as an overlay there are no releases, and thus (to my
understanding) a large part of git-flow becomes redundant.

True :D

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git
  - From: Ingolf Wagner

References:
- [proaudio] SVN to Git
  - From: Ingolf Wagner
- Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git
  - From: Marc Joliet
- Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git
  - From: Ingolf Wagner
- Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git
  - From: Marc Joliet

Messages sorted by: [ date | thread ]
Prev by Date: Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git
Next by Date: Re: [proaudio] [2973] media-sound/midipp: created ebuild folder
Previous by thread: Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git
Next by thread: Re: [proaudio] SVN to Git

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19+

http://listengine.tuxfamily.org/