Re: [proaudio] I want to contribute

[Karl Lindén <karl.j.linden@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 11/08/15 23:11, Ingolf Wagner wrote:
> Ok, I set up everything now. I use git svn, here is what I did.
> 
> git svn clone 
> svn+ssh://palo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/svnroot/proaudio/proaudio 
> <http://palo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/svnroot/proaudio/proaudio> 
> --stdlayout --revision=2960 cd proaudio/ git svn rebase
> 
> 
> I found some readme files (and a folder which I think is dead 
> proaudio-dev, whats that for?) I haven't read all the readme files
> so far, but I looks like you have the same files on the wiki page.
> 
> 
> anyway, is there any revision process in place? like pull-requests
> or something? Otherwise I would just put my ebuilds in there.
> 
> Cheers Ingolf Wagner
> 
> p.s.: happy to be on board, and will read the readme files
> tomorrow.
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-11-05 1:28 GMT+01:00 Wayne DePrince Jr. <waynedpj@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:waynedpj@xxxxxxxxxxx>>:
> 
> Il giorno mer, 04/11/2015 alle 15.21 +0100, Manuel Bärenz ha
> scritto:
>> I certainly agree that moving to Git is a very good idea. I
>> haven't contributed much to this overlay, and one of the reasons
>> is that I couldn't be bothered to learn SVN, and didn't want to
>> send patches via Email all the time.
>> 
>> Gitlab vs. Github: I have the feeling that the issue tracker on 
>> Gitlab is more usable and serious than the Github one. Other than
>> that I agree with Karl about the philosophy and would prefer
>> Gitlab. But I wouldn't mind Github either if people think that
>> popularity is important (and in case nobody wants to use Gitlab
>> just because of Proaudio).
>> 
> 
> +1 for GitLab: open license + better issue tracker
> 
> thanks for moving to Git.
> 
> 
> 
> 
Well, unfortunately I have not had time to do any proaudio work. I
will do as soon as I get the time. Since the overlay is terribly
outdated here and there and some ebuilds do no nothing but making
repoman unhappy I suggest we move to git package-by-package, rather
than copying everything in one go, because then we would need to
janitor the overlay in order to get meaningful repoman output.

The process I suggest is the following:
 1. Rename the the proaudio svn repo to old-proaudio.
 2. Create a git repo at GitLab and name it proaudio.
 3. Make the old-proaudio a consumer to (new) proaudio.
 4. Begin moving ebuilds and make sure repoman is happy.

What do you think? If no one opposes I will start doing this when I
get the time.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.1
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=ZLMl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----