[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Ecasound
- From: alex stone <compose59@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:50:40 +0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=A5VUHva7c2fW6jDA30I0lvnPkICNO9lPgyLQhqMtoX8=; b=Ue6gTExHJRq9dEe6lCc8oM/suC6i/KtKtCodl9DxAJYhWGuiPXT+ztEGj9vXxcbr43 RDf8TSkLlByncUx1JgRYGmPoyQFjqO94bYpNRSrUNHqg5n2KTVxmrzniwn6EN9Bxa6kt ASx5XWgdUEg7Vs+GboFaWFvlnrdeYX5h4JZrY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=hyz47Ql+WbloM86zyHzJebZpMXZL/BnygCnX3FHJF459Zxuwe/V2bcDoY+2VL+89UG +LSKISHnxwBusOuYYQgJjihgj952tAysQZPlPji7yhMEx0vV+8sUi+/vytSv4ecWzf0A 3xEO7w7/MbTeHT27TKCJjf4eQ5foyKuEK4Up0=
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 Oct 2010 12:54:30 alex stone wrote:
>> Can i respectfully request an updated ebuild for Ecasound, from 2.6.0,
>> to the current 2.7.2?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Alex.
>
> Hi Alex
>
> I'm not familiar with ecasound but looking at the output of eix I don't see it
> in the pro-audio tree, it seems to be in portage proper, maybe you could file
> a bug on bugs.gentoo.org and ask for it to be bumped there? I don't mean to
> sound funny or anything about this but if a package is in the portage tree
> already then in my humble opinion it makes sense for Gentoo developers to
> maintain it rather than duplicate the effort in the pro-audio overlay.
>
> Please see this list for all ecasound bugs, I notice a bump request for 2.7.1:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+ecasound
>
> I looked briefly at the homepage of Nama but I have little experience
> packaging perl applications on Gentoo and the dependencies look tricky to get
> right.
> It looks as though Nama could be installed by g-cpan somehow or maybe a
> nama-9999 ebuild could possibly be made.
>
> Sorry I couldn't be of more help and thanks for your emails.
>
> Best regards
> Gavin
>
>
>
Gavin, for your info, Nama can be installed from the git repo, using
normal configure, make, make install. portage has all the dependencies
already (Ecasound version not withstanding). Maybe it's easier than we
think. :)
Alex.
--
www.openoctave.org
midi-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
development-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx