[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Ecasound
- From: Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:06:42 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=7XrsauEY43SfPJO6G4Z5So2s6uOKtMuCgQxI89bF4vg=; b=ggr/Dn4SCDxJZkrY804UL1nAtEV+uNerUkH8wPcDhv3U+kK6EPx69TfuDSutTjdI1N a//J/jXA61gu7WRDxv1KvRggcc/GgDjfPCjykAgMry+4snWcMO+KPeW5DO09rTV/WqsG XQzYg+JJZBnZYdV8KaRprOSMNPxGc2ME+euzI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=ZmiOmFNxXbGDHdc2RQCW6SAH7yf4Bvpqw9Wfh5NVg2By3/kawqclLAQnD3VHDjj+mN fzTnb3jBWGN2VEKPGfc1dnFM88KYD31inO3iUNy47ZxA5X5eOO4pvwN4HIX4XZvLGeUo I6am++rbHQQrY4exKfo+3KmeZEm/KLLC7xiCo=
On Wednesday 27 Oct 2010 06:50:40 alex stone wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 Oct 2010 12:54:30 alex stone wrote:
> >> Can i respectfully request an updated ebuild for Ecasound, from 2.6.0,
> >> to the current 2.7.2?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Alex.
> >
> > Hi Alex
> >
> > I'm not familiar with ecasound but looking at the output of eix I don't
> > see it in the pro-audio tree, it seems to be in portage proper, maybe
> > you could file a bug on bugs.gentoo.org and ask for it to be bumped
> > there? I don't mean to sound funny or anything about this but if a
> > package is in the portage tree already then in my humble opinion it
> > makes sense for Gentoo developers to maintain it rather than duplicate
> > the effort in the pro-audio overlay.
> >
> > Please see this list for all ecasound bugs, I notice a bump request for
> > 2.7.1: http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+ecasound
> >
> > I looked briefly at the homepage of Nama but I have little experience
> > packaging perl applications on Gentoo and the dependencies look tricky to
> > get right.
> > It looks as though Nama could be installed by g-cpan somehow or maybe a
> > nama-9999 ebuild could possibly be made.
> >
> > Sorry I couldn't be of more help and thanks for your emails.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Gavin
>
> Gavin, for your info, Nama can be installed from the git repo, using
> normal configure, make, make install. portage has all the dependencies
> already (Ecasound version not withstanding). Maybe it's easier than we
> think. :)
>
> Alex.
Checking out the Nama git repo I see there is no autoconf configure script in
the tree, it's a Makefile.PL. I will have a deeper look at some point but no
promises on an ebuild just yet. :)
Gav