[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Ecasound
- From: alex stone <compose59@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:18:24 +0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=iafrPB1v7Ij7E3+M0HRZmQj+8N3sXjz6jVftietrXDE=; b=Xky4BafVWUEmZBqaz84OEN/PJY5eFFrTMyo8stWlnz1YrXg2tIGi7jmGmzvdy9FCFh c3biixphF3cCpDHMWe2LlBLhT/PnaXtaqR9QSQdQ8CwAf5B+6J/XyI4GpcDlSY8BrRec BzMz5tifk5996LFX+i1LBe2/Gtb3atoI+yqyo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Lvp53/n9yZ6ARzpi1sQudkFcC8z+garTENItyYEkNj1goKTuI3bORAX7HghFeIcK/S 5JLvQSqaxbrNRcZk/fpeiCZp7S0hZladUW4ZQHFXaUeNF0EpmuzOgOxL29ziRZJEuSNt GwwoQMPrlC+qsIxomOKJb1nBrT8gyaaen2s6Y=
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 Oct 2010 12:54:30 alex stone wrote:
>> Can i respectfully request an updated ebuild for Ecasound, from 2.6.0,
>> to the current 2.7.2?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Alex.
>
> Hi Alex
>
> I'm not familiar with ecasound but looking at the output of eix I don't see it
> in the pro-audio tree, it seems to be in portage proper, maybe you could file
> a bug on bugs.gentoo.org and ask for it to be bumped there? I don't mean to
> sound funny or anything about this but if a package is in the portage tree
> already then in my humble opinion it makes sense for Gentoo developers to
> maintain it rather than duplicate the effort in the pro-audio overlay.
>
> Please see this list for all ecasound bugs, I notice a bump request for 2.7.1:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+ecasound
>
> I looked briefly at the homepage of Nama but I have little experience
> packaging perl applications on Gentoo and the dependencies look tricky to get
> right.
> It looks as though Nama could be installed by g-cpan somehow or maybe a
> nama-9999 ebuild could possibly be made.
>
> Sorry I couldn't be of more help and thanks for your emails.
>
> Best regards
> Gavin
>
>
>
Gavin, thanks for the reply. I'll contact Gentoo main, and see if
they're willing to upgrade.
Alex.
--
www.openoctave.org
midi-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
development-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx