[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Ecasound
- From: Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:14:06 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=RhAeAUsU7rRmqRvkGy51PM4yUIqR0N9Vr5FVCrYUCyA=; b=VT+eDD9qGCPkkvDuHqAftoKDWRLozsNSO971z+JNcLGwBNS7+s5i/F0nrWcjvct13s Lj9UeasSPk6y9G7Mhh3FXSEPwb7r+UHM9fCsmS5P6DeGpj2aA4xctvjN4765bIJNtp0m fh4eVyr5A00Ii3CpZQSRVVyS959e77qI501GI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=X02Mxw/V7Dnjg/L5wivXW0+lz3Kxvna7SyiZafKAycZNFl7vAtWYx6pfQ8EtS52qni DKBLMa3s4tNl19tU1RRWp4K2xgdM671xPlDnMGbNx/89YYvlDXBZaQQd2yaW0/haZ8ew fOOp7kbZsy+QUG60mX6RbFcP2ImoyMcOf1+9c=
On Tuesday 26 Oct 2010 12:54:30 alex stone wrote:
> Can i respectfully request an updated ebuild for Ecasound, from 2.6.0,
> to the current 2.7.2?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alex.
Hi Alex
I'm not familiar with ecasound but looking at the output of eix I don't see it
in the pro-audio tree, it seems to be in portage proper, maybe you could file
a bug on bugs.gentoo.org and ask for it to be bumped there? I don't mean to
sound funny or anything about this but if a package is in the portage tree
already then in my humble opinion it makes sense for Gentoo developers to
maintain it rather than duplicate the effort in the pro-audio overlay.
Please see this list for all ecasound bugs, I notice a bump request for 2.7.1:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+ecasound
I looked briefly at the homepage of Nama but I have little experience
packaging perl applications on Gentoo and the dependencies look tricky to get
right.
It looks as though Nama could be installed by g-cpan somehow or maybe a
nama-9999 ebuild could possibly be made.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help and thanks for your emails.
Best regards
Gavin