[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/proaudio Archives
]
- To: proaudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [proaudio] Ecasound
- From: alex stone <compose59@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:11:03 +0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=IkTfE73teqISEQfB77BDdFnKWs1sO+SsIAY9HjzzhMM=; b=OfOwZHbV35QLkqVUmOeCxjyFi/lhUSpXMhZryDqg2jCRJuPT04ZD4g+ufM9a9auWk+ b+3QRPGeVYDY3LSLmDcz4mGlbdq6Q23rWxlyqJzEoYS8BKEzzn1TIg/MOap1uFGOZq8G pO1jqgA2as7qDgZLb26++/2EBpxAWmj6cKss8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=g0U/H+zD83KXQkUtoTyUTzl2GIryReBPttl1O2/q9PdS5CCRcXq/T6p/tLWaplIHk5 9f90BXXGfnFNYGx19azC3hYWIcKBQvY9dhWP0VO01/Zy7qNTs0VpOpAU0h2zGWForoPi xucrTueN3fgac+Z1w2k8SJtWWFRG3pn5nGm0Q=
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 Oct 2010 06:50:40 alex stone wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Gavin Pryke <gavinlee303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 26 Oct 2010 12:54:30 alex stone wrote:
>> >> Can i respectfully request an updated ebuild for Ecasound, from 2.6.0,
>> >> to the current 2.7.2?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Alex.
>> >
>> > Hi Alex
>> >
>> > I'm not familiar with ecasound but looking at the output of eix I don't
>> > see it in the pro-audio tree, it seems to be in portage proper, maybe
>> > you could file a bug on bugs.gentoo.org and ask for it to be bumped
>> > there? I don't mean to sound funny or anything about this but if a
>> > package is in the portage tree already then in my humble opinion it
>> > makes sense for Gentoo developers to maintain it rather than duplicate
>> > the effort in the pro-audio overlay.
>> >
>> > Please see this list for all ecasound bugs, I notice a bump request for
>> > 2.7.1: http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+ecasound
>> >
>> > I looked briefly at the homepage of Nama but I have little experience
>> > packaging perl applications on Gentoo and the dependencies look tricky to
>> > get right.
>> > It looks as though Nama could be installed by g-cpan somehow or maybe a
>> > nama-9999 ebuild could possibly be made.
>> >
>> > Sorry I couldn't be of more help and thanks for your emails.
>> >
>> > Best regards
>> > Gavin
>>
>> Gavin, for your info, Nama can be installed from the git repo, using
>> normal configure, make, make install. portage has all the dependencies
>> already (Ecasound version not withstanding). Maybe it's easier than we
>> think. :)
>>
>> Alex.
>
> Checking out the Nama git repo I see there is no autoconf configure script in
> the tree, it's a Makefile.PL. I will have a deeper look at some point but no
> promises on an ebuild just yet. :)
>
> Gav
>
>
>
That's fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to have a look. :)
Alex.
--
www.openoctave.org
midi-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
development-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx