| Re: [hatari-devel] SCSI DMA Control |
[ Thread Index |
Date Index
| More lists.tuxfamily.org/hatari-devel Archives
]
- To: hatari-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [hatari-devel] SCSI DMA Control
- From: Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 06:16:18 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1644128181; bh=uPoPie4tYxeMF4u7JVzUx3LhNmS77849g1jI4FLAAZo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=PbSTYgibR06fw6J1M1d/2oSuzo8rwnSPNM6BW5dKbioUlzy5fFP9ENYdaMHVVrdOk TDFMOMn2QIGtHx++F4CWsA5G+sQAnE1a11wcdOJWFJT0n5Q4edsKDDfvhqxISnzQ/R 8k6wI2hudoGpnrtqPDiM+tgwTVR1MyLrKpL1nD1CeaQWyFlIqpNP1NDueZqGxWZTX4 Pgbp+0Id0hc1ymZNEXVLP2zmlghrBlAyYkvYw9o5jnjLJFFGzUkmzRSF8pyy1FXwbS XxHRXa1xXznRnG0aQmYUaA8RGzAXTIXYv/EkUpW+QR/+IZ/ngklAO3Q2WmX3KjZpIE 4fhiNGTFIZ35Q==
Am Thu, 03 Feb 2022 17:34:51 -0500
schrieb "Roger Burrows" <anodyne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I've found that looking at the Hatari code is often a useful way of
> understanding how real hardware works, although of course I realise
> that it may not always be 100% accurate.
>
> I have been trying to figure out why bit 7 of 0xff8715 on a real TT
> is set (that's part of SCSI DMA control). However, I couldn't find
> anywhere in Hatari that sets it. So I have 2 questions:
> (1) did I miss something?
As others already indicated, I can confirm that this is not emulated in
Hatari yet. SCSI emulation is still experimental, especially the TT
part - I just implemented the bare minimum there to get some hard disk
drivers running.
Thomas