Re: [hatari-devel] TAT's debugger

[Thomas Huth <th.huth@xxxxxxxxx>]

Am Fri, 27 Aug 2021 21:41:46 +0300
schrieb Eero Tamminen <oak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi,
> 
> On 26.8.2021 23.26, Nicolas Pomarède wrote:
> > Le 26/08/2021 à 20:41, Troed Sångberg a écrit :  
> >> I did - it was discussed on #atariscne IRC a few times during 
> >> development. I haven't had time to test it yet but considering the 
> >> demoscene origin I expect I will love it :)
> >>
> >> The obvious question then becomes whether to mainline the new
> >> debugger interface.  
> > 
> > just had a look at the screenshot, and there're definitely some
> > good ideas. Maybe we need to let Tat settle things first and then
> > see how it could be added to main hatari.
> > the gfx debugger is nice (although I have a
> > much-better-never-released version myself as a stand alone 68000
> > program :) )
> > 
> >  From what I understand, the debugger UI uses a separate dir + some 
> > patches to support sending commands over TCP to hatari, so it seems 
> > quite posible to do, depending on Tat's will.  
> 
> I think I got the Hatari modifications extracted
> from Steven's Github repo, they're in the attached
> patch.
> 
> Would this part of those changes be acceptable:
> https://github.com/tattlemuss/hatari/commit/b0e77a84f13cbb9b010f63b12b3652ff0ef62732
> ?

I definitely don't like the idea of having yet another way of
triggering the debugger (i.e. the ioMemTab*.c changes) ... we have
already two ways of triggering the debugger (natfeats and xbios), that
should be enough, shouldn't it?

 Thomas